Indexed in Journament

the journal of applied psychology

ISSN 1939-1854· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,888 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
210 Articles
Scores higher than 45.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j appl psychol
Abbreviated Name j appl psychol
ISSN 1939-1854
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/apl/index.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 54.9 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 4.3 7.8
Content Distribution 34.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (210)

2019
Turning frowns (and smiles) upside down: A multilevel examination of surface acting positive and negative emotions on well-being.
Lennard, Anna C;Scott, Brent A;Johnson, Russell E;
Vol. 104 , No. 9 , pp. 1164-1180
632 views DOI Abstract
2020
From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance.
Loi, Teng Iat;Kuhn, Kristine M;Sahaym, Arvin;Butterfield, Kenneth D;Tripp, Thomas M;
514 views DOI Abstract
2009
avaliação de hábitos tabágicos em alunos do ensino secundário smoking habits in secondary school students
;C Damas;S Saleiro;A Marinho;G Fernandes;I Gomes
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 43-53
489 views Abstract
2016
Dark clouds or silver linings? A stigma threat perspective on the implications of an autism diagnosis for workplace well-being.
Johnson, Tiffany D;Joshi, Aparna;
Vol. 101 , No. 3 , pp. 430-49
487 views DOI Abstract
2008
avaliação económica do erlotinib, docetaxel, pemetrexedo e tratamento de suporte no tratamento de segunda ou terceira linhas de doentes com cancro do pulmão de não pequenas células an economic analysis of erlotinib, docetaxel, pemetrexed and best supportive care as second or third line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
;A Araújo;B Parente;R Sotto-Mayor;E Teixeira;T Almodôvar;F Barata;H Queiroga;C Pereira;H Pereira;F Negreiro;C Silva
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. 803-827
487 views Abstract
2017
The role of political affiliation in employment decisions: A model and research agenda.
Roth, Philip L;Goldberg, Caren B;Thatcher, Jason B;
Vol. 102 , No. 9 , pp. 1286-1304
471 views DOI Abstract
2019
I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace.
Ganegoda, Deshani B;Bordia, Prashant;
Vol. 104 , No. 6 , pp. 776-795
462 views DOI Abstract
2019
The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis.
Howard, Matt C;Cogswell, Joshua E;Smith, Mickey B;
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work-family conflict.
Allen, Tammy D;French, Kimberly A;Dumani, Soner;Shockley, Kristen M;
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
From cheery to "cheers"? Regulating emotions at work and alcohol consumption after work.
Sayre, Gordon M;Grandey, Alicia A;Chi, Nai-Wen;
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
A motivational lens model of person × situation interactions in employee creativity.
van Knippenberg, Daan;Hirst, Giles;
280 views DOI Abstract
2020
In line and out of the box: How ethical leaders help offset the negative effect of morality on creativity.
Liu, Xin;Liao, Hui;Derfler-Rozin, Rellie;Zheng, Xiaoming;Wee, Elijah X M;Qiu, Feng;
283 views DOI Abstract
2020
How cheating undermines the perceived value of justice in the workplace: The mediating effect of shame.
Hillebrandt, Annika;Barclay, Laurie J;
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance.
Loi, Teng Iat;Kuhn, Kristine M;Sahaym, Arvin;Butterfield, Kenneth D;Tripp, Thomas M;
514 views DOI Abstract
2019
Meaningfulness misfit: Consequences of daily meaningful work needs-supplies incongruence for daily engagement.
Vogel, Ryan M;Rodell, Jessica B;Sabey, Tyler B;
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Generalized exchange orientation: Conceptualization and scale development.
Yoshikawa, Katsuhiko;Wu, Chia-Huei;Lee, Hyun-Jung;
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Political affiliation and employment screening decisions: The role of similarity and identification processes.
Roth, Philip L;Thatcher, Jason B;Bobko, Philip;Matthews, Kevin D;Ellingson, Jill E;Goldberg, Caren B;
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of Situations in Situational Judgment Tests: Effects on construct saturation, predictive validity, and applicant perceptions.
Schäpers, Philipp;Mussel, Patrick;Lievens, Filip;König, Cornelius J;Freudenstein, Jan-Philipp;Krumm, Stefan;
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dispositional empathy, emotional display authenticity, and employee outcomes.
Aw, Sherry S Y;Ilies, Remus;De Pater, Irene E;
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Abusive supervision, thwarted belongingness, and workplace safety: A group engagement perspective.
Yang, Liu-Qin;Zheng, Xiaoming;Liu, Xin;Lu, Chang-Qin;Schaubroeck, John M;
370 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,888 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

54.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

34.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.