the journal of applied psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#10172 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated vor 14 Stunden

the journal of applied psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexierungen
ncbi
Kurzname j appl psychol
Abgekürzter Name j appl psychol
ISSN 1939-1854
Ziel und Umfang
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/apl/index.aspx
Autorenhinweise

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (210 total)

2019
Turning frowns (and smiles) upside down: A multilevel examination of surface acting positive and negative emotions on well-being.
Lennard, Anna C;Scott, Brent A;Johnson, Russell E;
Vol. 104 , No. 9 , pp. 1164-1180
613 views DOI Abstract
2020
From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance.
Loi, Teng Iat;Kuhn, Kristine M;Sahaym, Arvin;Butterfield, Kenneth D;Tripp, Thomas M;
481 views DOI Abstract
2009
avaliação de hábitos tabágicos em alunos do ensino secundário smoking habits in secondary school students
;C Damas;S Saleiro;A Marinho;G Fernandes;I Gomes
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 43-53
467 views Abstract
2008
avaliação económica do erlotinib, docetaxel, pemetrexedo e tratamento de suporte no tratamento de segunda ou terceira linhas de doentes com cancro do pulmão de não pequenas células an economic analysis of erlotinib, docetaxel, pemetrexed and best supportive care as second or third line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
;A Araújo;B Parente;R Sotto-Mayor;E Teixeira;T Almodôvar;F Barata;H Queiroga;C Pereira;H Pereira;F Negreiro;C Silva
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. 803-827
452 views Abstract
2016
Dark clouds or silver linings? A stigma threat perspective on the implications of an autism diagnosis for workplace well-being.
Johnson, Tiffany D;Joshi, Aparna;
Vol. 101 , No. 3 , pp. 430-49
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace.
Ganegoda, Deshani B;Bordia, Prashant;
Vol. 104 , No. 6 , pp. 776-795
445 views DOI Abstract
2017
The role of political affiliation in employment decisions: A model and research agenda.
Roth, Philip L;Goldberg, Caren B;Thatcher, Jason B;
Vol. 102 , No. 9 , pp. 1286-1304
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis.
Howard, Matt C;Cogswell, Joshua E;Smith, Mickey B;
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
From cheery to "cheers"? Regulating emotions at work and alcohol consumption after work.
Sayre, Gordon M;Grandey, Alicia A;Chi, Nai-Wen;
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work-family conflict.
Allen, Tammy D;French, Kimberly A;Dumani, Soner;Shockley, Kristen M;
387 views DOI Abstract
View All 210 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.