The role of Situations in Situational Judgment Tests: Effects on construct saturation, predictive validity, and applicant perceptions.
Clicks: 322
ID: 85578
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
67.5
/100
322 views
206 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #31 of 210 articles by views in the journal of applied psychology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 210 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Recent theorizing and empirical evidence suggesting that Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are more context-independent than previously thought has sparked a debate about the role of situation descriptions in SJTs. To contribute to this debate and add to our understanding of how SJTs work, this article conceptually embeds SJT performance in a situation construal model and examines the effects of situation descriptions on the construct saturation and predictive validity of SJT scores, as well as on applicant perceptions. Across two studies ( = 1,092 and 578) and different SJTs, personality and cognitive ability were equally important determinants of SJT performance regardless of whether situation descriptions were presented or omitted. The effects of removing situation descriptions on the criterion-related validity of SJT scores differed depending on the breadth of the criteria. For predicting global job performance criteria (in-role performance and organizational citizenship behavior), SJT validity was not significantly affected, whereas it decreased for predicting more specific criteria (interpersonal adaptability, efficacy for teamwork). Finally, the effects of omitting situation descriptions in SJTs on applicant perceptions were either negligible or small. Implications for SJT theory, research, and design are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
| Reference Key |
schpers2019thethe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Schäpers, Philipp;Mussel, Patrick;Lievens, Filip;König, Cornelius J;Freudenstein, Jan-Philipp;Krumm, Stefan; |
| Journal | the journal of applied psychology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1037/apl0000457
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.