psychological science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#172 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
41
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 hours ago

psychological science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name psychol sci
Abbreviated Name psychol sci
ISSN 1467-9280
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (93 total)

2014
Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-Analysis
Brooke N. Macnamara; David Z. Hambrick; Frederick L. Oswald
608 views DOI
2020
Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections.
von der Malsburg, Titus;Poppels, Till;Levy, Roger P;
, pp. 956797619890619
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Childhood Adversity, Socioeconomic Instability, Oxytocin-Receptor-Gene Methylation, and Romantic-Relationship Support Among Young African American Men
Kogan, S.
Vol. 30 , pp. 1234-1244
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
Separate Contribution of Striatum Volume and Pitch Discrimination to Individual Differences in Music Reward.
Hernández, Mireia;Palomar-García, María-Ángeles;Nohales-Nieto, Benito;Olcina-Sempere, Gustau;Villar-Rodríguez, Esteban;Pastor, Raúl;Ávila, César;Parcet, Maria-Antònia;
, pp. 956797619859339
270 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Our Country Needs a Strong Leader Right Now": Economic Inequality Enhances the Wish for a Strong Leader.
Sprong, Stefanie;Jetten, Jolanda;Wang, Zhechen;Peters, Kim;Mols, Frank;Verkuyten, Maykel;Bastian, Brock;Ariyanto, Amarina;Autin, Frédérique;Ayub, Nadia;Badea, Constantina;Besta, Tomasz;Butera, Fabrizio;Costa-Lopes, Rui;Cui, Lijuan;Fantini, Carole;Finchilescu, Gillian;Gaertner, Lowell;Gollwitzer, Mario;Gómez, Ángel;González, Roberto;Hong, Ying-Yi;Jensen, Dorthe Høj;Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga;Karasawa, Minoru;Kessler, Thomas;Klein, Olivier;Lima, Marcus;Mégevand, Laura;Morton, Thomas;Paladino, Paola;Polya, Tibor;Renvik, Tuuli Anna;Ruza, Aleksejs;Shahrazad, Wan;Shama, Sushama;Smith, Heather J;Torres, Ana Raquel;van der Bles, Anne Marthe;Wohl, Michael J A;
Vol. 30 , No. 11 , pp. 1625-1637
260 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yesterday's News: A Temporal Discontinuity in the Sting of Inferiority.
Kristal, Alexander C;O'Brien, Ed;Caruso, Eugene M;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 643-656
255 views DOI Abstract
2016
methodologic treatment for the contents of inclusive physical education in the subject adapted physical activities
;Annia Gómez-Valdés;Bárbara de la C. Roba-Lazo;Santa Ana Pascual-Fis
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 53-61
214 views Abstract
2017
the training of throwing the ball above the shoulders while moving in junior basketball athletes
;Roberto Crespo Contreras
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 59-66
207 views Abstract
2008
manual anual de ejercicios, una contribución a la transmisión de conocimientos teóricos atravéz de la relación interdisciplinaria educación física – física para el octavo grado
;María Antonia Afre Socorro;Daniel Labrador Labrador
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 95-101
199 views Abstract
2019
The Ethical Perils of Personal, Communal Relations: A Language Perspective.
Kouchaki, Maryam;Gino, Francesca;Feldman, Yuval;
, pp. 956797619882917
192 views DOI Abstract
View All 93 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
41
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

40.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.