Indexed in Journament

psychological science

ISSN 1467-9280· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.4/100
Journament Score
#10,450
Journament Rank
93
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name psychol sci
Abbreviated Name psychol sci
ISSN 1467-9280
URL http://pss.sagepub.com

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (93)

2014
Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-Analysis
642 views DOI
2020
Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections.
, pp. 956797619890619
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Separate Contribution of Striatum Volume and Pitch Discrimination to Individual Differences in Music Reward.
, pp. 956797619859339
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yesterday's News: A Temporal Discontinuity in the Sting of Inferiority.
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 643-656
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Our Country Needs a Strong Leader Right Now": Economic Inequality Enhances the Wish for a Strong Leader.
Vol. 30 , No. 11 , pp. 1625-1637
328 views DOI Abstract
2016
methodologic treatment for the contents of inclusive physical education in the subject adapted physical activities
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 53-61
268 views Abstract
2017
the training of throwing the ball above the shoulders while moving in junior basketball athletes
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 59-66
262 views Abstract
2019
The Ethical Perils of Personal, Communal Relations: A Language Perspective.
, pp. 956797619882917
261 views DOI Abstract
2020
Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections.
, pp. 956797619890619
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Our Country Needs a Strong Leader Right Now": Economic Inequality Enhances the Wish for a Strong Leader.
Vol. 30 , No. 11 , pp. 1625-1637
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Ethical Perils of Personal, Communal Relations: A Language Perspective.
, pp. 956797619882917
261 views DOI Abstract
2019
Separate Contribution of Striatum Volume and Pitch Discrimination to Individual Differences in Music Reward.
, pp. 956797619859339
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yesterday's News: A Temporal Discontinuity in the Sting of Inferiority.
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 643-656
328 views DOI Abstract
2018
the socio-psychological depths of sport
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 182-188
73 views
2017
didactic strategy to favor the teaching of written texts building forthe physical culture field
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 212-226
109 views Abstract
2017
the training of throwing the ball above the shoulders while moving in junior basketball athletes
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 59-66
262 views Abstract
2017
management systems oriented to projects: need for its implementation in sports academic institutions
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 271-282
250 views Abstract
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.