Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2346 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name J Am Geriatr Soc
Abbreviated Name j am geriatr soc
ISSN 1532-5415
Aim and Scope
URL http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117995531/home
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2002
Oral care reduces pneumonia in older patients in nursing homes
Yoneyama T;Yoshida M;Ohrui T;Mukaiyama H;Okamoto H;Hoshiba K;Ihara S;Yanagisawa S;Ariumi S;Morita T;Mizuno Y;Ohsawa T;Akagawa Y;Hashimoto K;Sasaki H; ;;
Vol. 50 , No. 3 , pp. -
775 views Abstract
1994
Colonization and infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in a long-term care facility
Terpenning MS;Bradley SF;Wan JY;Chenoweth CE;Jorgensen KA;Kauffman CA;;
Vol. 42 , No. 10 , pp. -
733 views Abstract
2018
Long-Term Cognitive Prognosis of Profoundly Deaf Older Adults After Hearing Rehabilitation Using Cochlear Implants.
Mosnier, Isabelle;Vanier, Antoine;Bonnard, Damien;Lina-Granade, Geneviève;Truy, Eric;Bordure, Philippe;Godey, Benoit;Marx, Mathieu;Lescanne, Emmanuel;Venail, Frédéric;Poncet, Christine;Sterkers, Olivier;Belmin, Joël;
Vol. 66 , No. 8 , pp. 1553-1561
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Better Together: Promoting Geriatrics Education across Residency Specialties with a Pilot Peer Teaching Exchange.
Streiter, Shoshana;Loewenthal, Julia;Berry, Sarah;Schwartz, Andrea Wershof;
353 views DOI Abstract
2014
Geriatric medicine and counterinsurgency: what can we learn about combating frailty?
Rockwood, Kenneth;
Vol. 62 , No. 10 , pp. 1979-80
351 views DOI
2019
Typology of Family Relationship and Elder Mistreatment in a US Chinese Population.
Li, Mengting;Guo, Man;Stensland, Meredith;Silverstein, Merril;Dong, XinQi;
Vol. 67 , No. S3 , pp. S493-S498
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
High-Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes.
Keeney, Tamra;Belanger, Emmanuelle;Jones, Rich N;Joyce, Nina R;Meyers, David J;Mor, Vincent;
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Availability of Evidence-Based Community Falls Prevention Programs: Considerations.
Tripken, Jennifer L;Cameron, Kathleen A;Eagen, Thomas J;
345 views DOI
2019
Life Course Violence: Child Maltreatment, IPV, and Elder Abuse Phenotypes in a US Chinese Population.
Wang, Bei;Dong, XinQi;
Vol. 67 , No. S3 , pp. S486-S492
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
The COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences of a Geriatrician-Hospitalist Caring for Older Adults.
Sinvani, Liron;
332 views DOI
View All 33 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.