Passive Digital Signature for Early Identification of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia.
Clicks: 351
ID: 68298
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
351 views
53 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #15 of 33 articles by views in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Developing scalable strategies for the early identification of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) is important. We aimed to develop a passive digital signature for early identification of ADRD using electronic medical record (EMR) data.A case-control study.The Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), a regional health information exchange in Indiana.Patients identified with ADRD and matched controls.We used data from the INPC that includes structured and unstructured (visit notes, progress notes, medication notes) EMR data. Cases and controls were matched on age, race, and sex. The derivation sample consisted of 10 504 cases and 39 510 controls; the validation sample included 4500 cases and 16 952 controls. We constructed models to identify early 1- to 10-year, 3- to 10-year, and 5- to 10-year ADRD signatures. The analyses included 14 diagnostic risk variables and 10 drug classes in addition to new variables produced from unstructured data (eg, disorientation, confusion, wandering, apraxia, etc). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve was used to determine the best models.The AUROC curves for the validation samples for the 1- to 10-year, 3- to 10-year, and 5- to 10-year models that used only structured data were .689, .649, and .633, respectively. For the same samples and years, models that used both structured and unstructured data produced AUROC curves of .798, .748, and .704, respectively. Using a cutoff to maximize sensitivity and specificity, the 1- to 10-year, 3- to 10-year, and 5- to 10-year models had sensitivity that ranged from 51% to 62% and specificity that ranged from 80% to 89%.EMR-based data provide a targeted and scalable process for early identification of risk of ADRD as an alternative to traditional population screening.
| Reference Key |
boustani2019passivejournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Boustani, Malaz;Perkins, Anthony J;Khandker, Rezaul Karim;Duong, Stephen;Dexter, Paul R;Lipton, Richard;Black, Christopher M;Chandrasekaran, Vasu;Solid, Craig A;Monahan, Patrick; |
| Journal | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/jgs.16218
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.