Indexed in Journament

asian pacific journal of tropical disease

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,591 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
22 Articles
Scores higher than 22.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name asian pacific journal of tropical disease
Abbreviated Name asian pacific journal of tropical disease

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 0.0
Innovation 66.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 64.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for asian pacific journal of tropical disease
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 0.0 26.4
Innovation 66.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.5
Content Distribution 64.7 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (22)

2014
Biological activities of Suaeda heterophylla and Bergenia stracheyi
Vol. 4 , No. Sup 2 , pp. 885-889
709 views Abstract
2015
Assessment of the haematological profile of children with malaria parasitaemia treated with three different artemisinin-based combination therapies
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 448-453
659 views Abstract
2016
In vitro antibacterial and antifungal activities of twelve sponges collected from the Anambas Islands, Indonesia
Vol. 6 , No. 9 , pp. 732-735
657 views Abstract
2012
Formulation and evaluation of sublingual tablets of losartan potassium
Vol. 2 , No. Sup 1 , pp. 130-135
633 views Abstract
2015
spectrum of histopathological lesions in lung autopsy
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 109-112
438 views Abstract
2018
evaluation of the antimicrobial effects of satureja montana essential oil alone and in combination with nisin on escherichia coli and staphylococcus aureus
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 54-60
424 views Abstract
2016
a comparison of physical and mechanical properties of biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 121-126
415 views Abstract
2015
detection of blood glucose level through gingival crevicular blood - a pilot study
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 69-72
396 views Abstract
2018
dietary recommendation for management of malnutrition in cirrhosis based on iranian traditional medicine, a systematic review
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 494-500
345 views Abstract
2018
relation of knowledge about cesarean disadvantages and delivery mode selection in women with first pregnancy; south of iran
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 550-556
305 views Abstract
2018
epidemiology and associated risk factors for sexual dysfunction: a systematic review
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 69-73
227 views Abstract
2018
evaluation of the antimicrobial effects of satureja montana essential oil alone and in combination with nisin on escherichia coli and staphylococcus aureus
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 54-60
424 views Abstract
2018
dietary recommendation for management of malnutrition in cirrhosis based on iranian traditional medicine, a systematic review
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 494-500
345 views Abstract
2016
a comparison of physical and mechanical properties of biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 121-126
415 views Abstract
2016
2016
the morphometric measurement of segments of humerus
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 38-40
311 views Abstract
2016
In vitro antibacterial and antifungal activities of twelve sponges collected from the Anambas Islands, Indonesia
Vol. 6 , No. 9 , pp. 732-735
657 views Abstract
Journament Score
28.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,591 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

66.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.