international journal of psychology : journal international de psychologie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#330 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 7 hours ago

international journal of psychology : journal international de psychologie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name int j psychol
Abbreviated Name int j psychol
ISSN 1464-066X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (193 total)

2013
detection of urinary metabolomics before and after pringle maneuver-induced liver ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
;Liyan Chen;Zhenchao Luo;Wenguang Fu;Xinxin Liao;Zhonglin Cui;Jie Zhou
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 345-351
459 views DOI Abstract
2016
the correlation of serums ccl11, ccl17, ccl26, and ccl27 and disease severity in patients with urticaria
;Tao Lu;Xiaoyang Jiao;Mengya Si;Ping He;Jinbo Zou;Shuping Zhang;Kang Zeng
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
449 views DOI Abstract
2017
association between the tacc3 rs798766 polymorphism and risk of urinary bladder cancer: a synthesis based on current evidence
;Xiang-Yu Meng;Ming-Jun Shi;Jia-Feng Chen;Yi Liao;Bang-Wang Hu;Ahmed Hireche
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
375 views DOI Abstract
2016
postnatal changes in humerus cortical bone thickness reflect the development of metabolic bone disease in preterm infants
;Shuko Tokuriki;Aiko Igarashi;Takashi Okuno;Genrei Ohta;Takuya Kosaka;Yusei Ohshima
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Construct validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire in Spanish-speaking countries: Assessment of the reliability, structural and external validity and cross-cultural equivalence.
Doroszuk, Marta;Kwiatkowska, Maria Magdalena;Torres-Marín, Jorge;Navarro-Carrillo, Ginés;Włodarczyk, Anna;Blasco-Belled, Ana;Martínez-Buelvas, Laura;Newton, James David Albert;Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar;Rogoza, Radosław;
328 views DOI Abstract
2013
hypovitaminosis d in geriatric acute care unit: a biomarker of longer length of stay
;Lise Hélard;Leyla Mateus-Hamdan;Olivier Beauchet;Cédric Annweiler
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 525-529
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Self-protection and growth as the motivational force behind majority group members' cultural adaptation and discrimination: A parallel mediation model via intergroup contact and threat.
Lefringhausen, Katharina;Ferenczi, Nelli;Marshall, Tara C;
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Croatian version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Links with higher- and lower-level personality traits and mood.
Gračanin, Asmir;Kardum, Igor;Gross, James J;
293 views DOI Abstract
2013
When threat to society becomes a threat to oneself: implications for right-wing attitudes and ethnic prejudice.
Onraet, Emma;Van Hiel, Alain;
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 25-34
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
laboratory and genetic biomarkers associated with cerebral blood flow velocity in hemoglobin sc disease
;Rayra Pereira Santiago;Camilo Vieira;Corynne Stephanie Ahouefa Adanho;Sanzio Silva Santana;Caroline Conceição Guarda;Camylla Vilas Boas Figueiredo;Luciana Magalhães Fiuza;Thassila Nogueira Pitanga;Junia Raquel Dutra Ferreira;Milena Magalhães Aleluia;Rodrigo Mota Oliveira;Dalila Luciola Zanette;Isa Menezes Lyra;Marilda Souza Goncalves
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
288 views DOI Abstract
View All 193 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.