law and financial markets review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6823 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
29
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

law and financial markets review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name law and financial markets review
Abbreviated Name law and financial markets review
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
“Because They Could”: Trust, integrity, and purpose in the regulation of corporate governance in the aftermath of the royal commission into misconduct in the banking, superannuation and financial services industry
O’brien, J.
Vol. 13 , pp. 141-156
342 views DOI
2012
experiência de profissionais e familiares de pacientes em cuidados paliativos
;Suzane Bandeira Magalhaes;Anamelia Lins e Silva Franco
Vol. 64 , No. 3 , pp. 94-109
245 views Abstract
2010
a subjetividade na sociedade de consumo: do sofrimento narcísico em tempos de excesso e privação
;Angela Maria Pires Caniato;Merly Luane Vargas Nascimento
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 25-37
209 views Abstract
2012
a memória na obra freudiana, para além da representação
;Diego Frichs Antonello;Regina Herzog
Vol. 64 , No. 1 , pp. 111-121
207 views Abstract
2014
fantasias sexuais e edípicas em pré-adolescentes atendidos em grupo de psicoterapia lúdica
;Karen Bodstein;Sérgio Luiz Saboya Arruda
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 58-74
199 views Abstract
2014
o papel do processamento léxico-semântico em modelos de leitura
;Alexandre de Pontes Nobre;Jerusa Fumagalli de Salles
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 128-142
197 views Abstract
2014
a representação materna em crianças com mães depressivas
;Paula Casagranda Mesquita;Sílvia Pereira da Cruz Benetti
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 53-67
196 views Abstract
2014
construções em torno da crise. saberes e práticas na atenção em saúde mental e produção de subjetividades
;Mônica Silva da Costa
Vol. 59 , No. 1 , pp. 94-108
192 views Abstract
2019
Empirical analysis supports the hayne long run reform thesis
Millhouse, D.
Vol. 13 , pp. 162-187
182 views DOI
2014
o corpo na história: a dupla natureza do homem na perspectiva materialista dialética de vigotski
;Nilson Guimarães Doria
Vol. 56 , No. 1 , pp. 35-49
139 views Abstract
View All 13 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
29
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.