philosophical transactions of the royal society of london series b, biological sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3109 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

philosophical transactions of the royal society of london series b, biological sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name philos trans r soc lond, b, biol sci
Abbreviated Name philos trans r soc lond, b, biol sci
ISSN 1471-2970
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2020
Erratum: Correction to 'Birdsong as a window into language origins and evolutionary neuroscience' (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences (2020) 375 1789 (20190060))
Aamodt, C.
Vol. 375 , pp. 20190748
404 views DOI
2020
Modelling meaning composition from formalism to mechanism.
Martin, Andrea E;Baggio, Giosuè;
Vol. 375 , No. 1791 , pp. 20190298
393 views DOI Abstract
2001
Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish
Taylor JS;Van de Peer Y;Braasch I;Meyer A;;
Vol. 356 , No. 1414 , pp. -
371 views Abstract
1982
Biological constraints on orthographic representation.
Marshall, J C;
Vol. 298 , No. 1089 , pp. 165-72
357 views Abstract
2020
The syntax-semantics interface in animal vocal communication.
Suzuki, Toshitaka N;Wheatcroft, David;Griesser, Michael;
Vol. 375 , No. 1789 , pp. 20180405
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
When does matriliny fail? The frequencies and causes of transitions to and from matriliny estimated from a de novo coding of a cross-cultural sample.
Shenk, Mary K;Begley, Ryan O;Nolin, David A;Swiatek, Andrew;
Vol. 374 , No. 1780 , pp. 20190006
289 views DOI Abstract
2017
tragedy and delirium in montevideo: the theater of copi
;Stefano Casi
Vol. 7 , No. 14 , pp. -
289 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bridging the divide between scientists and decision-makers: how behavioural ecologists can increase the conservation impact of their research?
Durant, Sarah M;Groom, Rosemary;Kuloba, Bernard;Samna, Abdoulkarim;Muzuma, Uakendisa;Gadimang, Phemelo;Mandisodza-Chikerema, Rose;Ipavec, Audrey;Mitchell, Nicholas;Ikanda, Dennis;Msuha, Maurus;
Vol. 374 , No. 1781 , pp. 20190011
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
sRNA/L1 retrotransposition: using siRNAs and miRNAs to expand the applications of the cell culture-based LINE-1 retrotransposition assay.
Tristan-Ramos, Pablo;Morell, Santiago;Sanchez, Laura;Toledo, Belen;Garcia-Perez, Jose L;Heras, Sara R;
Vol. 375 , No. 1795 , pp. 20190346
282 views DOI Abstract
2015
Exploring the role of environmental enteropathy in malnutrition, infant development and oral vaccine response
Gilmartin AA;Petri WA;;
Vol. 370 , No. 1671 , pp. -
273 views Abstract
View All 39 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.