Indexed in Journament

philosophical transactions of the royal society of london series b, biological sciences

ISSN 1471-2970· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0/100
Journament Score
#7,559
Journament Rank
39
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name philos trans r soc lond, b, biol sci
Abbreviated Name philos trans r soc lond, b, biol sci
ISSN 1471-2970

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2020
Modelling meaning composition from formalism to mechanism.
Vol. 375 , No. 1791 , pp. 20190298
425 views DOI Abstract
1982
Biological constraints on orthographic representation.
Vol. 298 , No. 1089 , pp. 165-72
394 views Abstract
2001
Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish
Vol. 356 , No. 1414 , pp. -
391 views Abstract
2020
The syntax-semantics interface in animal vocal communication.
Vol. 375 , No. 1789 , pp. 20180405
343 views DOI Abstract
2017
tragedy and delirium in montevideo: the theater of copi
Vol. 7 , No. 14 , pp. -
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bridging the divide between scientists and decision-makers: how behavioural ecologists can increase the conservation impact of their research?
Vol. 374 , No. 1781 , pp. 20190011
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
sRNA/L1 retrotransposition: using siRNAs and miRNAs to expand the applications of the cell culture-based LINE-1 retrotransposition assay.
Vol. 375 , No. 1795 , pp. 20190346
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
When does matriliny fail? The frequencies and causes of transitions to and from matriliny estimated from a de novo coding of a cross-cultural sample.
Vol. 374 , No. 1780 , pp. 20190006
306 views DOI Abstract
2015
2020
Pleistocene Arctic megafaunal ecological engineering as a natural climate solution?
Vol. 375 , No. 1794 , pp. 20190122
286 views DOI Abstract
2020
sRNA/L1 retrotransposition: using siRNAs and miRNAs to expand the applications of the cell culture-based LINE-1 retrotransposition assay.
Vol. 375 , No. 1795 , pp. 20190346
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Harnessing employment-based social assistance programmes to scale up nature-based climate action.
Vol. 375 , No. 1794 , pp. 20190127
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
Phase synchronization varies systematically with linguistic structure composition.
Vol. 375 , No. 1791 , pp. 20190305
286 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modelling meaning composition from formalism to mechanism.
Vol. 375 , No. 1791 , pp. 20190298
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials.
Vol. 375 , No. 1791 , pp. 20180522
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
Identifying medullary bone in extinct avemetatarsalians: challenges, implications and perspectives.
Vol. 375 , No. 1793 , pp. 20190133
233 views DOI Abstract
2020
Case study of radial fibrolamellar bone tissues in the outer cortex of basal sauropods.
Vol. 375 , No. 1793 , pp. 20190143
221 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.