Indexed in Journament

población y desarrollo

ISSN 2076-0531· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,442 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
94 Articles
Scores higher than 50.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name población y desarrollo
Abbreviated Name población y desarrollo
ISSN 2076-0531
URL http://revistascientificas.una.py/index.php/RE/index

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 69.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for población y desarrollo
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.1 7.8
Content Distribution 69.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (94)

2016
a knowledge-based step length estimation method based on fuzzy logic and multi-sensor fusion algorithms for a pedestrian dead reckoning system
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 70-
421 views DOI Abstract
2016
One neighbor’s income is another neighbor’s envy: exploring subjective living standards in Paraguay
Vol. 22 , No. 43 , pp. 35-44
370 views Abstract
2017
terrain extraction in built-up areas from satellite stereo-imagery-derived surface models: a stratified object-based approach
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
368 views DOI Abstract
2018
the role of social factors in the accessibility of urban areas for people with motor disabilities
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 131-
354 views DOI Abstract
2014
rapid prototyping — a tool for presenting 3-dimensional digital models produced by terrestrial laser scanning
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 871-890
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
on data quality assurance and conflation entanglement in crowdsourcing for environmental studies
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 78-
342 views DOI Abstract
2016
automatic pose estimation of uncalibrated multi-view images based on a planar object with a predefined contour model
Vol. 5 , No. 12 , pp. 244-
336 views DOI Abstract
2014
the application of webgis tools for visualizing coastal flooding vulnerability and planning for resiliency: the new jersey experience
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 408-429
336 views DOI Abstract
2015
collaborative strategies for sustainable eu flood risk management: foss and geospatial tools—challenges and opportunities for operative risk analysis
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 2704-2727
331 views DOI Abstract
2016
integrated wifi/pdr/smartphone using an adaptive system noise extended kalman filter algorithm for indoor localization
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 8-
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
indoor reconstruction from floorplan images with a deep learning approach
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 65-
251 views DOI Abstract
2018
optimal route searching with multiple dynamical constraints—a geometric algebra approach
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 172-
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
long-term changes of the wildland–urban interface in the polish carpathians
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 137-
225 views DOI Abstract
2018
analysis of hydrological sensitivity for flood risk assessment
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 51-
230 views DOI Abstract
2018
geographic prevalence and mix of regional cuisines in chinese cities
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 183-
123 views DOI Abstract
2018
the role of social factors in the accessibility of urban areas for people with motor disabilities
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 131-
354 views DOI Abstract
2018
development of a conceptual mapping standard to link building and geospatial information
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 162-
227 views DOI Abstract
2018
population synthesis handling three geographical resolutions
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 174-
103 views DOI Abstract
2018
holo3dgis: leveraging microsoft hololens in 3d geographic information
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 60-
170 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,442 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.