Indexed in Journament

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology

ISSN 1590-3478· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,893 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 86.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Neurol Sci
Abbreviated Name neurol sci
ISSN 1590-3478
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10072

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 27.8 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 46.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2020
2019
Generation and validation of algorithms to identify subjects with dementia using administrative data.
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dietary pattern in relation to the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.
Vol. 40 , No. 10 , pp. 2031-2043
436 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hospital and healthcare insurance system record-based epidemiological study of myasthenia gravis in southern and northern China.
435 views DOI Abstract
2020
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder After Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
High HbA level is correlated with blood-brain barrier disruption in syphilis patients.
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 83-90
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
CMAP decrement by low-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation in different hand muscles of ALS patients.
374 views DOI Abstract
2025
Levodopa-responsive dystonia, parkinsonism, and treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder in Williams syndrome.
Vol. 46 , pp. 463-468
125 views DOI Abstract
2023
A new national survey of centers for cognitive disorders and dementias in Italy.
103 views DOI Abstract
2023
A review on epilepsy, current treatments, and potential of medicinal plants as an alternative treatment.
106 views DOI Abstract
2020
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder After Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
High HbA level is correlated with blood-brain barrier disruption in syphilis patients.
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 83-90
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Epilepsy over the centuries: a disease survived at the time.
183 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comprehension of written texts for the assessment of clinical competence and decision making in people with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.
323 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,893 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

27.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

46.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.