Journal of adolescence | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2639 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

Journal of adolescence

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name J Adolesc
Abbreviated Name j adolesc
ISSN 1095-9254
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10959254
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
Gender differences across multiple types of prosocial behavior in adolescence: A meta-analysis of the prosocial tendency measure-revised (PTM-R).
Xiao, Sonya Xinyue;Hashi, Emi C;Korous, Kevin M;Eisenberg, Nancy;
Vol. 77 , pp. 41-58
395 views DOI Abstract
2020
Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well-being: Evidence from three large datasets.
Twenge, Jean M;Martin, Gabrielle N;
Vol. 79 , pp. 91-102
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Roles of age, gender and psychological difficulties in adolescent mentalizing.
Poznyak, Elena;Morosan, Larisa;Perroud, Nader;Speranza, Mario;Badoud, Deborah;Debbané, Martin;
Vol. 74 , pp. 120-129
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
An examination of trauma narratives: Narrative rumination, self-reflection, and identity in young adulthood.
Marin, Kelly A;Shkreli, Amanda;
Vol. 76 , pp. 139-151
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
With a little help from my friends? A longitudinal look at the role of peers versus friends on adolescent alcohol use.
Weybright, Elizabeth H;Beckmeyer, Jonathon J;Caldwell, Linda L;Wegner, Lisa;Smith, Edward A;
Vol. 73 , pp. 14-17
305 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of the school environment on early sexual risk behavior: A longitudinal analysis of students in English secondary schools.
Peterson, Amy J;Allen, Elizabeth;Viner, Russell;Bonell, Chris;
Vol. 85 , pp. 106-114
295 views DOI Abstract
2008
Ethnic identity, externalizing problem behaviour and the mediating role of self-esteem among Dutch, Turkish-Dutch and Moroccan-Dutch adolescents.
Wissink, Inge B;Deković, Maja;Yağmur, Sengül;Stams, Geert Jan;de Haan, Mariëtte;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 223-40
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
The influence of gratitude on learning engagement among adolescents: The multiple mediating effects of teachers' emotional support and students' basic psychological needs.
Jin, Guichun;Wang, Youzhi;
Vol. 77 , pp. 21-31
289 views DOI Abstract
2013
À propos de la dichotomie « possession inaliÉnable » vs « possession aliÉnable » en yowlÈ, langue mandÉ- sud de cÔte d’ivoire / about the dichotomy « inalienable possession » vs « alienable possession » in yowlÈ, a mande language from cÔte d’ivoire / despre dicotomia „posesie inalienabilĂ” versus „posesie alienabilĂ” În yowlÈ, o limbĂ mandarinĂ de pe coasta de fildeŞ
;Henri Gadou
, No. 12 , pp. 46-52
283 views Abstract
2015
Patterns of relationship and sexual behaviors in Mexican adolescents and associations with well-being: A latent class approach.
Espinosa-Hernández, Graciela;Vasilenko, Sara A;
Vol. 44 , pp. 280-90
271 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.