results in physics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3945 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 22 heures

results in physics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
scopus doaj ulakbim
Nom Abrégé results in physics
Nom Abrégé results in physics
ISSN 2211-3797
Objectifs et Portée
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/results-in-physics
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2019
Vibration analysis of dynamic mode scanning thermal microscope nanomachining probe
Sohrabi, Mohammad;Torkanpouri, Kaveh E.;
Vol. 13 , pp. -
539 views Abstract
2019
The investigation of gamma-ray and neutron shielding parameters of Na2O-CaO-P2O5-SiO2 bioactive glasses using MCNPX code
Tekin, H.O.;Kilicoglu, O.;Kavaz, E.;Altunsoy, E.E.;Almatari, M.;Agar, O.;Sayyed, M.I.;
Vol. 12 , pp. 1797-1804
457 views Abstract
2018
Dielectric and impedance spectroscopic studies of three phase graphene/titania/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite films
Ishaq, Saira;Kanwal, Farah;Atiq, Shahid;Moussa, Mahmoud;Azhar, Umar;Gul, Iffrah;Losic, Dusan;
Vol. 11 , pp. 540-548
440 views Abstract
2017
Application of Nonnegative Tensor Factorization for neutron-gamma discrimination of Monte Carlo simulated fission chamber’s output signals
Laassiri, Mounia;Hamzaoui, El-Mehdi;Moursli, Rajaa Cherkaoui El;
Vol. 7 , pp. 1422-1426
397 views Abstract
2018
Characteristic of an adiabatic charging reversible circuit with a Lithium ion capacitor as an energy storage device
Nakata, Shunji;
Vol. 10 , pp. 964-966
390 views Abstract
2017
A comprehensive study of the energy absorption and exposure buildup factors of different bricks for gamma-rays shielding
Sayyed, M.I.;AlZaatreh, M.Y.;Dong, M.G.;Zaid, M.H.M.;Matori, K.A.;Tekin, H.O.;
Vol. 7 , pp. 2528-2533
377 views Abstract
2017
Synthesis, dielectric, conductivity and magnetic studies of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn(1/3)−xAlxO2 (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06) for cathode materials of lithium-ion batteries
Murali, N.;Margarette, S.J.;Veeraiah, V.;
Vol. 7 , pp. 1379-1388
367 views Abstract
2019
Modeling the roles of carbon nanotubes and interphase dimensions in the conductivity of nanocomposites
Zare, Y.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
363 views DOI
2019
Molecular dynamics study of thermal properties of nanofluids composed of one-dimensional (1-D) network of interconnected gold nanoparticles
Essajai, R.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
359 views DOI
2015
Dissolution of alpha-prime precipitates in thermally embrittled S2205-duplex steels during reversion-heat treatment
Shamanth, V.;Ravishankar, K.S.;
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 297-303
356 views Abstract
View All 40 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.