research in education | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4473 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

research in education

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name research in education
Abbreviated Name research in education
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2015
economy and environment. points of view and actions
;Ramona Maria CHIVU
Vol. III , No. 8 (2/2015) , pp. 73-76
327 views Abstract
2019
Re-imagined post-colonial geographies: Graduate students explore spaces of resistance in the wake of Ferguson
Dache-Gerbino, A.
Vol. 104 , pp. 3-23
318 views DOI
2013
emerging economies and sustainable development
;Dana S. POP;Cosmina I. CRACIUNESCU
Vol. I , No. 2 (2/2013) , pp. 232-240
289 views Abstract
2014
fostering the entrepreneurial culture, a pillar for regional development
;Mihaela STET
Vol. II , No. 5 (3/2014) , pp. 73-78
285 views Abstract
2015
the request for a bridge between politics and public policies
;Ibrahim ALMAASHI
Vol. III , No. 8 (2/2015) , pp. 255-258
281 views Abstract
2015
food security in romania
;Silviu STANCIU
Vol. III , No. 9 (3/2015) , pp. 83-92
261 views Abstract
2014
positionings and delimitations concerning the performance audit
;Victoria FIRESCU
Vol. II , No. 6 (4/2014) , pp. 49-56
246 views Abstract
2014
business risks in the smes from the north east region
;Leronard Ovidiu TURCU;Andreea FERARU;Costel CEOCEA
Vol. II , No. 3 (1/2014) , pp. 618-631
245 views Abstract
2015
caribbean offshore corporate structures under a swot analysis
;Ana-Maria GEAMÃNU
Vol. III , No. 7 (1/2015) , pp. 263-274
226 views Abstract
2016
examination of the solvency of enterprises dealing with accommodation service providing in the northern great plain region
;Veronika FENYVES;Krisztina DAJNOKI;Domícián MÁTÉ;Baji-Gál KATA
Vol. IV , No. 11 (2/2016) , pp. 197-203
213 views Abstract
View All 24 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.