british journal for the history of science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5364 / 33,981
📉 Poor
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

british journal for the history of science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim ahci soc
Short Name br j hist sci
Abbreviated Name br j hist sci
ISSN 1474-001X
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BJH
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2019
Cécile Morette and the Les Houches summer school for theoretical physics; or, how Girl Scouts, the 1944 Caen bombing and a marriage proposal helped rebuild French physics (1951-1972).
Verschueren, Pierre;
, pp. 1-22
362 views DOI Abstract
2017
Discipline building in Germany: women and genetics at the Berlin Institute for Heredity Research.
Stamhuis, Ida H;Vogt, Annette B;
Vol. 50 , No. 2 , pp. 267-295
355 views DOI Abstract
2018
Relocating anti-racist science: the 1950 UNESCO Statement on Race and economic development in the global South.
Gil-Riaño, Sebastián;
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 281-303
346 views DOI Abstract
2005
molecular markers. amplified fragment length polymorphism
;Pržulj Novo;Perović Dragan
Vol. 11 , No. 1-4 , pp. 69-79
334 views Abstract
2019
Editing entomology: Natural-history periodicals and the shaping of scientific communities in nineteenth-century Britain
Wale, M.
, pp. 0-0
331 views DOI
2019
Metaphors and other slippery creatures.
Strick, James E;
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 345-352
283 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing and normalizing the population through hormone therapies in Italian science, 1926-1950.
Beccalossi, Chiara;
, pp. 1-22
279 views DOI Abstract
2012
effects of some biostimulators on yield and seed viability of linseed
;Jevđović Radosav;Filipović Vladimir;Marković Jasmina;Dimitrijević Snežana;Todorović Goran;Ugrenović Vladan
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 41-50
277 views Abstract
2019
Natural Knowledge, Inc.: the Royal Society as a metropolitan corporation.
Moxham, Noah;
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 249-271
272 views DOI Abstract
2016
sweet corn (zea mays l.): fresh ear yield in dependance of genotype and the environment
;Srdić Jelena;Pajić Zorica;Filipović Milomir
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 27-33
243 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.