journal of postcolonial writing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#726 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

journal of postcolonial writing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim ahci
Short Name journal of postcolonial writing
Abbreviated Name journal of postcolonial writing
ISSN 1744-9855
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rjpw20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2019
Lost in reading: The predicament of postcolonial writing in Kamel Daoud’s The Meursault Investigation
Alkyam, S.
Vol. 55 , pp. 459-471
411 views DOI
2015
protection level of ai h5n1 vaccine clade 2.1.3 commercial against ai h5n1 clade 2.3.2 virus from ducks to spf chicken in laboratory conditions
;Indriani R;Dharmayanti NLPI
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 64-70
311 views DOI Abstract
2015
concentrate supplementation for crossbred bulls to increase profitability of smallholder fattening operations in east java, indonesia
;Ratnawati D;Cowley F;Mayberry D;Poppi D
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 41-47
286 views DOI Abstract
2007
heat stress effect and given of hexane extract jaloh bark (salix tetrasperma roxb) to cortisol level, triiodothyronine and hematology profile of broiler chickens
;Sugito;W Manalu;D.A Astuti;E Handharyani;Chairul
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 175-182
275 views Abstract
1999
improvement of native grassland by legumes introduction and tillage techniques
;Syamsu Bahar;S Hardjosoewignjo;I Kismono;O Haridjaja
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 185-190
260 views Abstract
2006
a rapid, solid phase extraction (spe) technique for the extraction and gas chromatographic determination lindane pesticide residue in tissue and milk
;Yuningsih;Sri Yuliastuti
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 79-83
254 views Abstract
2008
characterisation of enzymatic activities of h5n1 influenza virus
;Simson Tarigan;Risa Indriani;Darminto
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 153-159
250 views Abstract
2011
characteristics of seminal plasma and cryopreservation of anoa (bubalus sp.) semen obtained by electroejaculation
;Yudi;T.L. Yusuf;B Purwantara;D. Sajuthi;M Agil
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 41-48
242 views Abstract
2001
antibody fluctuations of infected cattle with fasciola gigantica and the effect of triclabendazole treatment
;S Widjajanti;S.E Estuningsih;Suharyanta
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 265-268
242 views Abstract
2012
reproductive performances of boe, kacang and boerka does
;Simon Elieser;Sumadi;G Suparta;Subandriyo
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 100-106
238 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.