Indexed in Journament

the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences

ISSN 1758-5368· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,352 of 29,299 scored journals (34,033 indexed)
129 Articles
Scores higher than 88.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j gerontol b psychol sci soc sci
Abbreviated Name j gerontol b psychol sci soc sci
ISSN 1758-5368
URL https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.6
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 45.6 25.9
Innovation 37.5 24.1
Community Impact 15.7 6.5
Content Distribution 22.4 89.7
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (129)

2020
The Country that Never Retires: The Gendered Pathways to Retirement in South Korea.
Lee, Yeonjin;Yeung, Wei-Jun Jean;
473 views DOI Abstract
2018
Late Life Employment Histories and Their Association With Work and Family Formation During Adulthood: A Sequence Analysis Based on ELSA.
Wahrendorf, Morten;Zaninotto, Paola;Hoven, Hanno;Head, Jenny;Carr, Ewan;
Vol. 73 , No. 7 , pp. 1263-1277
455 views DOI Abstract
2020
"It's luck as to what sort of family you're born into" Cumulative dis/advantage generative systemic processes across the life course of a baby-boom birth cohort.
Wildman, Josephine M;
436 views DOI Abstract
2018
'Left like stones in the middle of the road': Narratives of aging alone and coping strategies in rural Albania and Bulgaria.
Conkova, Nina;Vullnetari, Julie;King, Russell;Fokkema, Tineke;
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
Associations between self-reported sensory impairment and risk of cognitive decline and impairment in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) cohort.
Maharani, Asri;Dawes, Piers;Nazroo, James;Tampubolon, Gindo;Pendleton, Neil;, ;
404 views DOI Abstract
2017
Perceived Control Moderates the Effects of Functional Limitation on Older Adults' Social Activity: Findings From the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing.
Curtis, Rachel G;Windsor, Tim D;Luszcz, Mary A;
Vol. 72 , No. 4 , pp. 571-581
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Early-Life Military Exposures and Functional Impairment Trajectories Among Older Male Veterans: The Buffering Effect of Psychological Resilience
Taylor, M.
Vol. 74 , pp. 832-841
380 views DOI
2018
Financial Fraud among Older Americans:Evidence and Implications.
DeLiema, Marguerite;Deevy, Martha;Lusardi, Annamaria;Mitchell, Olivia S;
351 views DOI Abstract
2011
Assessment of Cognition Using Surveys and Neuropsychological Assessment: The Health and Retirement Study and the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study
Eileen M. Crimmins, Jin‐Kyung Kim, Kenneth M. Langa, David R. Weir
152 views DOI Abstract
2026
More positive and more active: Effects of daily intergenerational engagement on emotion and physical activity
Claire M Growney, Tammy English
130 views DOI Abstract
2026
Spending time helping others and well-being of givers: Age differences in immediate and long-term effects on well-being
Jaelim Cho, Susan Turk Charles, David M. Almeida, Soomi Lee
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Naturalistic Driving Engineered Trajectories Forecast Future Cognitive Decline
Subrata Pal, David Brown, Chen Chen, Semere Bekena, R. R. Singh, Yiqi Zhu, Kaylin Taylor, Noor Al Hammadi, Soumendra N. Lahiri, Ganesh Muneshwar Babulal
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Lifetime family caregiving for older U.S. adults by men and women, 2011 and 2023
Vicki A. Freedman, Yee To Ng
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Caregiver-provider relationship quality and health outcomes in family caregivers of people living with dementia
Henrietta A. Bennett, Wesley R. Browning, Vicki Winstead, Carolyn E. Ziminski Pickering
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Activity diversity and psychological richness across midlife and older adulthood
Anthony D. Ong, Soomi Lee, Jaelim Cho
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Ambivalent return: Older adults’ homecoming after wartime displacement
Adi Vitman-Schorr, Michal Segal
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Characterizing lesbian, gay, and bisexual patients’ experiences with elder abuse: A chart review study
Naomi Shin, Hongwei Zhang, Maria K. Mor, Joseph Shin, Melissa E. Dichter, Lena K. Makaroun
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
‘Keeping me sharp”: Self-perceived effects of grandparenthood on cognition: An exploratory thematic analysis
Dana Smith, Teresa Phuong-Vy Pham, Edwina R. Orchard, Janelle Applequist, Helena J. V. Rutherford, Jennifer L. O’Brien
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Race/ethnicity, completed parity, and women’s later-life health in the Health and Retirement Study
Cheryl Elman, Andrew S. London, Angela M. O’Rand
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
Internalizing active aging norms: Self-attributed responsibility as a mediator linking prescriptive views on aging to late-life preparation
Yaeji Kim-Knauss, Maria Clara Pinheiro de Paula Couto, Fiona S. Rupprecht, Helene Hoi-Lam Fung, Thomas M. Hess, Jana Nikitin, Shyhnan Liou, Frieder R. Lang, Klaus Rothermund
17 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,352 of 29,299 scored
(34,033 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

45.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

37.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

22.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.