Adaptive driving, not unsafe: Older drivers’ compensatory strategies and lower simulated crash risk

Clicks: 3
ID: 338027
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #132 of 133 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 133 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The global aging population has led to an increasing number of older active drivers. While age-related physical and cognitive changes are associated with increased crash risk, specific on-road adaptations and safety outcomes of older drivers remain unclear. This study examined distinct driving characteristics, personality traits, and cognitive processes related to decision-making among middle-aged and older drivers in a simulated driving environment. METHODS: We assessed driving performance in a high-fidelity motorcycle simulator across drivers in three age groups: middle-aged (30-54; n = 40), aged 65-74 (n = 34), and aged 75 + (75-86; n = 29). Comparative analysis focused on speed regulation, braking behavior, control stability, and accident rates. Additionally, questionnaire measures and a computerized decision-making task were employed to assess risk perception and risky decision-making. RESULTS: Compared to the middle-aged group, both older groups demonstrated a significantly more conservative driving profile: lower mean speeds, fewer speeding violations, longer braking maneuvers, reduced variation in throttle control, and a lower incidence of simulated accidents. Drivers aged 75+ also reported higher perceived risk in driving scenarios and displayed diminished discrimination between risk and non-risk situations in a braking decision task. Mediation analyses showed that steering variance in the simulator and self-reported health/safety risk-taking significantly mediated the relationship between age group and number of accidents. DISCUSSION: The findings indicate that older drivers adopt proactive compensatory strategies that could result in fewer simulated accidents. These findings challenge a purely deficit-oriented perspective on older driver safety, underscoring the critical role of behavioral adaptation and strategic self-regulation in maintaining safe mobility.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224772068 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/geronb/gbag217
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.