language testing in asia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4826 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated vor 2 Wochen

language testing in asia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexierungen
scopus
Kurzname language testing in asia
Abgekürzter Name language testing in asia
ISSN
Ziel und Umfang
URL
Autorenhinweise

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2017
University faculty members’ perspectives on English language demands in content courses and a reform of university entrance examinations in Japan: a needs analysis
Sawaki, Yasuyo;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
381 views Abstract
2019
The language assessment literacy needs of Iranian EFL teachers with a focus on reformed assessment policies
Firoozi, T.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
369 views DOI
2018
Post hoc evaluation of analytic rating scales for improved functioning in the assessment of interactive L2 speaking ability
McDonald, Kurtis;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-23
342 views Abstract
2018
How to evaluate the TEFL students’ translations: through analytic, holistic or combined method?
Amini, M.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
270 views DOI
2019
Assessing peer review pattern and the effect of face-to-face and mobile-mediated modes on students’ academic writing development
Farahani, A.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
252 views DOI
2019
o narrador em corinthians (2) vs. palestra (1): (im)parcialidade?
;James Rios de Oliveira Santos ;Tiago Angelo
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 75-89
244 views Abstract
2009
o uso do onde e do aonde na escrita de professores primÁrios na bahia do sÉculo xix
;Emília Helena Portella Monteiro de Souza;Noemi Pereira de Santana
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. -
240 views
2020
Discursive conflicts in news media and the suspension of a government-led test of English in Korea
Shin, D.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
220 views DOI
2011
filosofia e poesia em maria zambrano
;Cícero Cunha Bezerra
Vol. 1 , No. 6 , pp. -
197 views Abstract
2014
literatura de cordel no brasil: um ponto no mar da lusofonia
;Paulo Geovane Silva;Douglas Tomácio
Vol. 1 , No. 13 , pp. 44-57
187 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.