Journal of Learning Disabilities | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1363 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Journal of Learning Disabilities
Abbreviated Name journal of learning disabilities
ISSN 0022-2194
Aim and Scope
URL http://ldx.sagepub.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Cognitive-Linguistic Skills Underlying Word Reading and Spelling Difficulties in Chinese Adolescents With Dyslexia.
Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa;Lam, Chun Bun;
, pp. 22219419882648
592 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kindergarten Training in Phonological Awareness: Fluency and Comprehension Gains Are Greatest for Readers at Risk in Grades 1 Through 9
Kjeldsen, A.
Vol. 52 , pp. 366-382
386 views DOI
2020
The Lecture Note-Taking Skills of Adolescents With and Without Learning Disabilities.
Oefinger, Lisa M;Peverly, Stephen T;
, pp. 22219419897268
371 views DOI Abstract
New Teachers' Perceptions on Being Prepared to Teach Students With Learning Disabilities: Insights From California.
Gottfried, Michael A;Hutt, Ethan L;Kirksey, J Jacob;
Vol. 52 , No. 5 , pp. 383-398
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bidirectional Cross-Linguistic Association of Phonological Skills and Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Hong Kong Chinese-English Bilingual Readers
Deng, Q.
Vol. 52 , pp. 299-311
348 views DOI
Grouping for reading instruction: does one size fit all?
Schumm, J S;Moody, S W;Vaughn, S;
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 477-88
343 views Abstract
2019
Conditional Longitudinal Relations of Elementary Literacy Skills to High School Reading Comprehension
Petscher, Y.
Vol. 52 , pp. 324-336
340 views DOI
2019
A Developmental Examination of Narrative Writing in EL and EL1 School Children Who Are Typical Readers, Poor Decoders, or Poor Comprehenders.
Herbert, Katherine E D;Massey-Garrison, Angela;Geva, Esther;
, pp. 22219419881625
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences Using a Direct Mapping Approach for At-Risk Second Language Learners: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yeung, Susanna Siu-Sze;Savage, Robert;
, pp. 22219419894563
293 views DOI Abstract
2018
translating the importance of simulation to practice: strengthening learning outcomes
;Farhan Alshammari;Eddieson Pasay-an;Maria Charito Laarni Indonto;Ferdinand Gonzales
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 60-67
276 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.