Indexed in Journament

Journal of Learning Disabilities

ISSN 0022-2194· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,123 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 34.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Journal of Learning Disabilities
Abbreviated Name journal of learning disabilities
ISSN 0022-2194
URL http://ldx.sagepub.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 33.3 28.8
Innovation 61.5 31.2
Community Impact 7.9 13.4
Content Distribution 66.1 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2019
Cognitive-Linguistic Skills Underlying Word Reading and Spelling Difficulties in Chinese Adolescents With Dyslexia.
Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa;Lam, Chun Bun;
, pp. 22219419882648
663 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Lecture Note-Taking Skills of Adolescents With and Without Learning Disabilities.
Oefinger, Lisa M;Peverly, Stephen T;
, pp. 22219419897268
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kindergarten Training in Phonological Awareness: Fluency and Comprehension Gains Are Greatest for Readers at Risk in Grades 1 Through 9
Kjeldsen, A.
Vol. 52 , pp. 366-382
425 views DOI
New Teachers' Perceptions on Being Prepared to Teach Students With Learning Disabilities: Insights From California.
Gottfried, Michael A;Hutt, Ethan L;Kirksey, J Jacob;
Vol. 52 , No. 5 , pp. 383-398
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bidirectional Cross-Linguistic Association of Phonological Skills and Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Hong Kong Chinese-English Bilingual Readers
Deng, Q.
Vol. 52 , pp. 299-311
388 views DOI
Grouping for reading instruction: does one size fit all?
Schumm, J S;Moody, S W;Vaughn, S;
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 477-88
381 views Abstract
2019
A Developmental Examination of Narrative Writing in EL and EL1 School Children Who Are Typical Readers, Poor Decoders, or Poor Comprehenders.
Herbert, Katherine E D;Massey-Garrison, Angela;Geva, Esther;
, pp. 22219419881625
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Conditional Longitudinal Relations of Elementary Literacy Skills to High School Reading Comprehension
Petscher, Y.
Vol. 52 , pp. 324-336
366 views DOI
2019
Teaching Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences Using a Direct Mapping Approach for At-Risk Second Language Learners: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yeung, Susanna Siu-Sze;Savage, Robert;
, pp. 22219419894563
343 views DOI Abstract
2018
translating the importance of simulation to practice: strengthening learning outcomes
;Farhan Alshammari;Eddieson Pasay-an;Maria Charito Laarni Indonto;Ferdinand Gonzales
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 60-67
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Lecture Note-Taking Skills of Adolescents With and Without Learning Disabilities.
Oefinger, Lisa M;Peverly, Stephen T;
, pp. 22219419897268
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences Using a Direct Mapping Approach for At-Risk Second Language Learners: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yeung, Susanna Siu-Sze;Savage, Robert;
, pp. 22219419894563
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kindergarten Training in Phonological Awareness: Fluency and Comprehension Gains Are Greatest for Readers at Risk in Grades 1 Through 9
Kjeldsen, A.
Vol. 52 , pp. 366-382
425 views DOI
2019
A Developmental Examination of Narrative Writing in EL and EL1 School Children Who Are Typical Readers, Poor Decoders, or Poor Comprehenders.
Herbert, Katherine E D;Massey-Garrison, Angela;Geva, Esther;
, pp. 22219419881625
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cognitive-Linguistic Skills Underlying Word Reading and Spelling Difficulties in Chinese Adolescents With Dyslexia.
Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa;Lam, Chun Bun;
, pp. 22219419882648
663 views DOI Abstract
2019
New Teachers’ Perceptions on Being Prepared to Teach Students With Learning Disabilities: Insights From California
Gottfried, M.
Vol. 52 , pp. 383-398
226 views DOI
2019
SRSD Fractions: Helping Students at Risk for Disabilities Add/Subtract Fractions With Unlike Denominators
Ennis, R.
Vol. 52 , pp. 399-412
295 views DOI
2019
Bidirectional Cross-Linguistic Association of Phonological Skills and Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Hong Kong Chinese-English Bilingual Readers
Deng, Q.
Vol. 52 , pp. 299-311
388 views DOI
2019
Conditional Longitudinal Relations of Elementary Literacy Skills to High School Reading Comprehension
Petscher, Y.
Vol. 52 , pp. 324-336
366 views DOI
2018
translating the importance of simulation to practice: strengthening learning outcomes
;Farhan Alshammari;Eddieson Pasay-an;Maria Charito Laarni Indonto;Ferdinand Gonzales
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 60-67
315 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,123 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.