Research in developmental disabilities | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1200 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Research in developmental disabilities

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Res Dev Disabil
Abbreviated Name research in developmental disabilities
ISSN 1873-3379
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-developmental-disabilities
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2019
Efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention in caregivers of people with intellectual disabilities: A randomized controlled trial (EDUCA-IV trial).
González-Fraile, Eduardo;Domínguez-Panchón, Ana I;Berzosa, Pilar;Costas-González, Ana B;Garrido-Jimenez, Inmaculada;Rufino-Ventura, Dulce;López-Aparicio, Jose Ignacio;Martín-Carrasco, Manuel;, ;
Vol. 94 , pp. 103458
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Persistent handwriting problems are hard to predict: A longitudinal study of the development of handwriting in primary school.
Duiser, Ivonne H F;Ledebt, Annick;van der Kamp, John;Savelsbergh, Geert J P;
Vol. 97 , pp. 103551
402 views DOI Abstract
2014
Characteristics of international websites with information on developmental disabilities.
Reichow, Brian;Gelbar, Nicholas W;Mouradjian, Keri;Shefcyk, Allison;Smith, Isaac C;
Vol. 35 , No. 10 , pp. 2293-8
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of ADHD symptoms in the relationship between academic achievement and psychopathological symptoms.
Visser, Linda;Linkersdörfer, Janosch;Hasselhorn, Marcus;
Vol. 97 , pp. 103552
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Motor functions of higher education students with dysgraphia.
Tal-Saban, Miri;Weintraub, Naomi;
Vol. 94 , pp. 103479
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of reading mode and braille reading patterns on braille reading speed and comprehension: A study of students with visual impairments in China
Chen, X.
Vol. 91 , pp. 0-0
351 views DOI
2019
An inquiry into how parents of children with autism spectrum disorder interact with their children in a motor skill-based play setting.
Ku, Byungmo;Heinonen, Gregory Alexander;MacDonald, Megan;Hatfield, Bridget;
Vol. 94 , pp. 103494
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Do children with dyslexia present a handwriting deficit? Impact of word orthographic and graphic complexity on handwriting and spelling performance.
Gosse, Claire;Van Reybroeck, Marie;
Vol. 97 , pp. 103553
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
Self-perceptions in children with probable developmental coordination disorder with and without overweight.
Noordstar, Johannes J;Volman, M J M;
Vol. 99 , pp. 103601
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
A thematic synthesis of siblings' lived experiences of autism: Distress, responsibilities, compassion and connection
Leedham, A.
Vol. 97 , pp. 0-0
308 views DOI
View All 22 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.