Indexed in Journament

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR

ISSN 1558-9102· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1/100
Journament Score
#10,818
Journament Rank
30
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name J Speech Lang Hear Res
Abbreviated Name j speech lang hear res
ISSN 1558-9102

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
Speech Errors and Phonological Awareness in Children Ages 4 and 5 Years With and Without Speech Sound Disorder.
Vol. 62 , No. 9 , pp. 3276-3289
558 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving Reading Comprehension in the Primary Grades: Mediated Effects of a Language-Focused Classroom Intervention.
Vol. 62 , No. 8 , pp. 2812-2828
539 views DOI Abstract
2019
Phonological and Semantic Contributions to Verbal Short-Term Memory in Young Children With Developmental Stuttering.
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 644-667
517 views DOI Abstract
2019
Speech Production From a Developmental Perspective.
Vol. 62 , No. 8S , pp. 2946-2962
495 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bilingualism and Processing Speed in Typically Developing Children and Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
, pp. 1-15
473 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rhyme Production Strategies Distinguish Stuttering Recovery and Persistence.
Vol. 62 , pp. 1-18
465 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Cross-Lagged Analysis of Emotion Regulation, Peer Problems, and Emotional Problems in Children With and Without Early Language Difficulties: Evidence From the Millennium Cohort Study.
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 1227-1239
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques.
Vol. 62 , No. 8S , pp. 2999-3032
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Methodological Quality of Short-Term/Working Memory Treatments in Poststroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review.
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 1979-2001
393 views DOI Abstract
2021
Bidirectional Associations of Childhood Stuttering With Behavior and Temperament.
, pp. 1-17
280 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study of Communicative Participation in Young Children With Language Disorders.
, pp. 1-14
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Cross-Lagged Analysis of Emotion Regulation, Peer Problems, and Emotional Problems in Children With and Without Early Language Difficulties: Evidence From the Millennium Cohort Study.
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 1227-1239
443 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does the Inclusion of a Genome-Wide Polygenic Score Improve Early Risk Prediction for Later Language and Literacy Delay?
, pp. 1-12
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bilingualism and Processing Speed in Typically Developing Children and Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
, pp. 1-15
473 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Relationship Between Lexical and Phonological Development in French-Speaking Children: A Longitudinal Study.
, pp. 1-15
99 views DOI Abstract
2019
A View of the Lexical-Grammatical Link in Young Latinos With Specific Language Impairment Using Language-Specific and Conceptual Measures.
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 1775-1786
276 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diurnal Cortisol Dynamics, Perceived Stress, and Language Production in Aphasia.
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 1416-1426
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Speech Errors and Phonological Awareness in Children Ages 4 and 5 Years With and Without Speech Sound Disorder.
Vol. 62 , No. 9 , pp. 3276-3289
558 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.