Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5444 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Speech Lang Hear Res
Abbreviated Name j speech lang hear res
ISSN 1558-9102
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2019
Speech Errors and Phonological Awareness in Children Ages 4 and 5 Years With and Without Speech Sound Disorder.
Brosseau-Lapré, Françoise;Roepke, Elizabeth;
Vol. 62 , No. 9 , pp. 3276-3289
535 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving Reading Comprehension in the Primary Grades: Mediated Effects of a Language-Focused Classroom Intervention.
Jiang, Hui;Logan, Jessica;
Vol. 62 , No. 8 , pp. 2812-2828
521 views DOI Abstract
2019
Phonological and Semantic Contributions to Verbal Short-Term Memory in Young Children With Developmental Stuttering.
Anderson, Julie D;Wagovich, Stacy A;Brown, Bryan T;
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 644-667
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
Speech Production From a Developmental Perspective.
Redford, Melissa A;
Vol. 62 , No. 8S , pp. 2946-2962
479 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analysis of Amount and Style of Oral Interaction Related to Language Outcomes in Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review (2006-2016).
Sultana, Nuzhat;Wong, Lena L N;Purdy, Suzanne C;
, pp. 1-23
460 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rhyme Production Strategies Distinguish Stuttering Recovery and Persistence.
Gerwin, Katelyn;Brosseau-Lapré, Françoise;Brown, Barbara;Christ, Sharon;Weber, Christine;
Vol. 62 , pp. 1-18
445 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bilingualism and Processing Speed in Typically Developing Children and Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
Park, Ji Sook;Miller, Carol A;Sanjeevan, Teenu;van Hell, Janet G;Weiss, Daniel J;Mainela-Arnold, Elina;
, pp. 1-15
442 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Cross-Lagged Analysis of Emotion Regulation, Peer Problems, and Emotional Problems in Children With and Without Early Language Difficulties: Evidence From the Millennium Cohort Study.
Forrest, Claire L;Gibson, Jenny L;Halligan, Sarah L;St Clair, Michelle C;
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 1227-1239
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques.
Terband, Hayo;Namasivayam, Aravind;Maas, Edwin;van Brenk, Frits;Mailend, Marja-Liisa;Diepeveen, Sanne;van Lieshout, Pascal;Maassen, Ben;
Vol. 62 , No. 8S , pp. 2999-3032
377 views DOI Abstract
2018
An Eye-Tracking Study of Receptive Verb Knowledge in Toddlers.
Valleau, Matthew James;Konishi, Haruka;Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick;Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy;Arunachalam, Sudha;
Vol. 61 , No. 12 , pp. 2917-2933
371 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.