Indexed in Journament

Journal of Educational Psychology

ISSN 0022-0663· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
20.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,731 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
9 Articles
Scores higher than 1.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Journal of Educational Psychology
Abbreviated Name j educ psychol
ISSN 0022-0663
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/edu

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 3.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 72.4 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2019
Examining Sources and Mechanisms of Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Comparing English Learners and Non-English Learners within the Simple View of Reading.
Cho, Eunsoo;Capin, Philip;Roberts, Greg;Roberts, Garrett J;Vaughn, Sharon;
Vol. 111 , No. 6 , pp. 982-1000
559 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pathways to reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from 4 to 9 years of age
Hjetland, H.
Vol. 111 , pp. 751-763
434 views DOI
2019
Correction: Automaticity of word recognition is a unique predictor of reading fluency in middle-school students [Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 2, (2019), (314-330)] DOI: 10.1037/edu0000279
not, found
Vol. 111 , pp. 826
345 views DOI
2010
Effects of an Early Literacy Professional Development Intervention on Head Start Teachers and Children
Powell, D.
Vol. 102 , pp. 299-312
333 views DOI
2018
Cognitive and emotional math problems largely dissociate: Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia and mathematics anxiety
Devine, A.
Vol. 110 , pp. 431-444
313 views DOI
2019
Efficacy of a high school extensive reading intervention for English learners with reading difficulties
Vaughn, S.
Vol. 111 , pp. 373-386
268 views DOI
2017
language revitalization and historical trauma: a historical analysis of the chickasaw and chikashshanompa’
;Goodin, M
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 5-15
259 views Abstract
2017
examining portrayals of female protagonists by female screenwriters using feminist critical discourse analysis.
;Shapiro, B.
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 37-47
241 views Abstract
1953
A comparison between children who have moved from school to school with those who have been in continuous residence on various factors of adjustment.
Downie, N. M.;
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 50-53
118 views DOI
2019
Efficacy of a high school extensive reading intervention for English learners with reading difficulties
Vaughn, S.
Vol. 111 , pp. 373-386
268 views DOI
2019
Correction: Automaticity of word recognition is a unique predictor of reading fluency in middle-school students [Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 2, (2019), (314-330)] DOI: 10.1037/edu0000279
not, found
Vol. 111 , pp. 826
345 views DOI
2019
Pathways to reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from 4 to 9 years of age
Hjetland, H.
Vol. 111 , pp. 751-763
434 views DOI
2019
Examining Sources and Mechanisms of Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Comparing English Learners and Non-English Learners within the Simple View of Reading.
Cho, Eunsoo;Capin, Philip;Roberts, Greg;Roberts, Garrett J;Vaughn, Sharon;
Vol. 111 , No. 6 , pp. 982-1000
559 views DOI Abstract
2018
Cognitive and emotional math problems largely dissociate: Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia and mathematics anxiety
Devine, A.
Vol. 110 , pp. 431-444
313 views DOI
2017
language revitalization and historical trauma: a historical analysis of the chickasaw and chikashshanompa’
;Goodin, M
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 5-15
259 views Abstract
2017
examining portrayals of female protagonists by female screenwriters using feminist critical discourse analysis.
;Shapiro, B.
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 37-47
241 views Abstract
2010
Effects of an Early Literacy Professional Development Intervention on Head Start Teachers and Children
Powell, D.
Vol. 102 , pp. 299-312
333 views DOI
1953
A comparison between children who have moved from school to school with those who have been in continuous residence on various factors of adjustment.
Downie, N. M.;
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 50-53
118 views DOI
Journament Score
20.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,731 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

20.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

3.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.