coordination chemistry reviews | Journament

Journal Ranking

#167 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 17 hours ago

coordination chemistry reviews

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name coordination chemistry reviews
Abbreviated Name coordination chemistry reviews
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (77 total)

2019
Terpyridine-metal complexes: Applications in catalysis and supramolecular chemistry
Wei C.
Vol. 385 , pp. 1-19
401 views DOI
2010
Nonbenzenoid aromatic isocyanides: New coordination building blocks for organometallic and surface chemistry
Barybin M.
Vol. 254 , pp. 1240-1252
332 views DOI
2016
efficient restoration of the dystrophin gene reading frame and protein structure in dmd myoblasts using the cindel method
;Jean-Paul Iyombe-Engembe;Dominique L Ouellet;Xavier Barbeau;Joël Rousseau;Pierre Chapdelaine;Patrick Lagüe;Jacques P Tremblay
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. -
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intra-cluster growth meets inter-cluster assembly: The molecular and supramolecular chemistry of atomically precise nanoclusters
Kang X.
Vol. 394 , pp. 1-38
301 views DOI
2019
Anion coordination chemistry: From recognition to supramolecular assembly
Zhao J.
Vol. 378 , pp. 415-444
299 views DOI
2012
deep sequencing analyses of dsirnas reveal the influence of 3′ terminal overhangs on dicing polarity, strand selectivity, and rna editing of sirnas
;Jiehua Zhou;Min-Sun Song;Ashley M Jacobi;Mark A Behlke;Xiwei Wu;John J Rossi
Vol. 1 , No. C , pp. -
292 views DOI Abstract
2011
N-Heterocyclic carbene–rhodium complexes as catalysts for hydroformylation and related reactions
W. Gil,A.M. Trzeciak;W. Gil;A.M. Trzeciak;
Vol. 255 , pp. 473-483
280 views DOI
2017
activation of ampk attenuated cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting cdk2 via p21/p27 and mir-29 family pathways in rats
;Hanping Qi;Yan Liu;Shuzhi Li;Yunping Chen;Lei Li;Yonggang Cao;Mingyao E;Pilong Shi;Chao Song;Baiyan Li;Hongli Sun
Vol. 8 , pp. 277-290
241 views Abstract
2016
from cryptic toward canonical pre-mrna splicing in pompe disease: a pipeline for the development of antisense oligonucleotides
;Atze J Bergsma;Stijn LM in ‘t Groen;Frans W Verheijen;Ans T van der Ploeg;WWM Pim Pijnappel
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. -
239 views DOI Abstract
2015
normalization of overexpressed α-synuclein causing parkinson's disease by a moderate gene silencing with rna interference
;Masaki Takahashi;Mari Suzuki;Masashi Fukuoka;Nobuhiro Fujikake;Shoko Watanabe;Miho Murata;Keiji Wada;Yoshitaka Nagai;Hirohiko Hohjoh
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
View All 77 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.