deep sequencing analyses of dsirnas reveal the influence of 3′ terminal overhangs on dicing polarity, strand selectivity, and rna editing of sirnas
Clicks: 377
ID: 142581
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
64.2
/100
377 views
255 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #6 of 77 articles by views in coordination chemistry reviews
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
25/27 Base duplex RNAs that are substrates for Dicer have been demonstrated to enhance RNA interference (RNAi) potency and efficacy. Since the target sites are not always equally susceptible to suppression by small interfering RNA (siRNA), not all 27-mer duplexes that are processed into the corresponding conventional siRNAs show increased potency. Thus random designing of Dicer-substrate siRNAs (DsiRNAs) may generate siRNAs with poor RNAi due to unpredictable Dicer processing. Previous studies have demonstrated that the 3′-overhang affects dicing cleavage site and the orientation of Dicer entry. Moreover, an asymmetric 27-mer duplex having a 3′ two-nucleotide overhang and 3′-DNA residues on the blunt end has been rationally designed to obtain greater efficacy. This asymmetric structure directs dicing to predictably yield a single primary cleavage product. In the present study, we analyzed the in vitro and intracellular dicing patterns of chemically synthesized duplex RNAs with different 3′-overhangs. Consistent with previous studies, we observed that Dicer preferentially processes these RNAs at a site 21–22 nucleotide (nt) from the two-base 3′-overhangs. We also observed that the direction and ability of human Dicer to generate siRNAs can be partially or completely blocked by DNA residues at the 3′-termimi. To examine the effects of various 3′-end modifications on Dicer processing in cells, we employed Illumina Deep sequencing analyses to unravel the fates of the asymmetric 27-mer duplexes. To validate the strand selection process and knockdown capabilities we also conducted dual-luciferase psiCHECK reporter assays to monitor the RNAi potencies of both the “sense” (S) and “antisense” (AS) strands derived from these DsiRNAs. Consistent with our in vitro Dicer assays, the asymmetric duplexes were predictably processed into desired primary cleavage products of 21–22-mers in cells. We also observed the trimming of the 3′ end, especially when DNA residues were incorporated into the overhangs and this trimming ultimately influenced the Dicer-cleavage site and RNAi potency. Moreover, the observation that the most efficacious strand was the most abundant revealed that the relative frequencies of each “S” or “AS” strand are highly correlated with the silencing activity and strand selectivity. Collectively, our data demonstrate that even though the only differences between a family of DsiRNAs was the 3′ two-nuclotide overhang, dicing polarity and strand selectivity are distinct depending upon the sequence and chemical nature of this overhang. Thus, it is possible to predictably control dicing polarity and strand selectivity via simply changing the 3′-end overhangs without altering the original duplex sequence. These optimal design features of 3′-overhangs might provide a facile approach for rationally designing highly potent 25/27-mer DsiRNAs.
| Reference Key |
zhou2012moleculardeep
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Jiehua Zhou;Min-Sun Song;Ashley M Jacobi;Mark A Behlke;Xiwei Wu;John J Rossi |
| Journal | coordination chemistry reviews |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.1038/mtna.2012.6
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.