Indexed in Journament

journal of nephropharmacology

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.1 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,424 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 91.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of nephropharmacology
Abbreviated Name journal of nephropharmacology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 42.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 80.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of nephropharmacology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 42.6 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.3
Content Distribution 80.3 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2014
activity of benzimidazoles against dientamoeba fragilis (trichomonadida, monocercomonadidae) in vitro and correlation of beta-tubulin sequences as an indicator of resistance
Vol. 21 , pp. 41-
395 views DOI Abstract
2008
current bioethical issues in parasitology
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 489-494
385 views DOI Abstract
2015
detection of toxoplasma gondii dna in horse meat from supermarkets in france and performance evaluation of two serological tests
Vol. 22 , pp. 14-
372 views DOI Abstract
2018
seroprevalence of toxoplasma gondii and encephalitozoon cuniculi among domestic rabbits in central china
Vol. 25 , pp. 9-
371 views DOI Abstract
2001
swine trichinellosis in slaughterhouses of the metropolitan area of toluca
Vol. 8 , pp. S249-S251
352 views DOI Abstract
2000
in vivo antileishmanial action of ir-(cod)-pentamidine tetraphenylborate on leishmania donovani and leishmania major mouse models
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 103-108
340 views DOI Abstract
2014
toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in wild small rodents, potentially preys of ocelots in north-eastern mexico
Vol. 21 , pp. 57-
324 views DOI Abstract
2018
seroprevalence of toxoplasma gondii and encephalitozoon cuniculi among domestic rabbits in central china
Vol. 25 , pp. 9-
371 views DOI Abstract
2017
light and transmission electron microscopy of cepedea longa (opalinidae) from fejervarya limnocharis
Vol. 24 , pp. 6-
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
Frequency of enuresis and related factors among school children in Guilan province; a single center investigation
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 146-149
303 views Abstract
2015
detection of toxoplasma gondii dna in horse meat from supermarkets in france and performance evaluation of two serological tests
Vol. 22 , pp. 14-
372 views DOI Abstract
2014
activity of benzimidazoles against dientamoeba fragilis (trichomonadida, monocercomonadidae) in vitro and correlation of beta-tubulin sequences as an indicator of resistance
Vol. 21 , pp. 41-
395 views DOI Abstract
2014
toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in wild small rodents, potentially preys of ocelots in north-eastern mexico
Vol. 21 , pp. 57-
324 views DOI Abstract
2012
prosorhynchus crucibulum (digenea: bucephalidae) miracidium morphology and its passive transmission pattern
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 277-280
273 views DOI Abstract
2011
zoonotic onchocerciasis in hiroshima, japan, and molecular analysis of a paraffin section of the agent for a reliable identification
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 185-188
225 views DOI Abstract
2010
Journament Score
40.1/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,424 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

42.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

80.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.