Indexed in Journament

journal of athletic training

ISSN 1938-162X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,505 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 9.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j athl train
Abbreviated Name j athl train
ISSN 1938-162X
URL http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/6731

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of athletic training
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 42.0 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 63.5 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
The Psychosocial Implications of Sport Specialization in Pediatric Athletes.
446 views DOI Abstract
2018
National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Facilitating Work-Life Balance in Athletic Training Practice Settings.
Vol. 53 , No. 8 , pp. 796-811
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Motion Sickness Susceptibility and Baseline Vestibular and Ocular-Motor Performance in Adolescent Athletes.
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exertional Heat-Stroke Preparedness in High School Football by Region and State Mandate Presence.
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Engaging Athletic Trainers in Concussion Detection: Overview of the National Football League ATC Spotter Program, 2011-2017.
344 views DOI Abstract
2017
nitrogen fertilizer management for tidal submergence tolerant landrace rice (oryza sativa l.) cultivars
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 193-203
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
in-vivo hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic properties of tagetes lucida alcoholic extract in streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemic wistar albino rats
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 169-181
324 views DOI Abstract
2016
growth, yield, plant quality and nutrition of basil (ocimum basilicum l.) under soilless agricultural systems
Vol. 61 , No. 2 , pp. 181-186
291 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of potassium application in drought-stressed tobacco (nicotiana rustica l.) plants: comparison of root with foliar application
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 121-130
277 views DOI Abstract
2024
Experiences of Adversity and Validity of Baseline Concussion Testing.
Vol. 59 , pp. 373-380
57 views DOI Abstract
2023
Prevalence and Association of Exercise Dependence and Eating Disorder Risk in Collegiate Student-Athletes.
Vol. 58 , pp. 813-820
80 views DOI Abstract
2023
Collaborative Mental Health Care in Collegiate Athletics: Behavioral Health Providers' Perceived Role of the Athletic Trainer.
Vol. 58 , pp. 855-864
62 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Psychosocial Implications of Sport Specialization in Pediatric Athletes.
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
Motion Sickness Susceptibility and Baseline Vestibular and Ocular-Motor Performance in Adolescent Athletes.
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exertional Heat-Stroke Preparedness in High School Football by Region and State Mandate Presence.
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Engaging Athletic Trainers in Concussion Detection: Overview of the National Football League ATC Spotter Program, 2011-2017.
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Facilitating Work-Life Balance in Athletic Training Practice Settings.
Vol. 53 , No. 8 , pp. 796-811
411 views DOI Abstract
2017
in-vivo hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic properties of tagetes lucida alcoholic extract in streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemic wistar albino rats
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 169-181
324 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,505 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.