Motion Sickness Susceptibility and Baseline Vestibular and Ocular-Motor Performance in Adolescent Athletes.

Clicks: 360
ID: 20677
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 14 articles by views in journal of athletic training

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
High school athletes with a history of motion sickness susceptibility exhibit higher baseline vestibular and ocular-motor scores than those without a history of motion sickness susceptibility.To examine the effects of motion sickness susceptibility on baseline vestibular and ocular-motor functioning, neurocognitive performance, and symptom scores.Cross-sectional study.Preseason concussion testing.A convenience sample of high school athletes (N = 308, age = 15.13 ± 1.21 years) involved in a variety of sports.Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening, computerized neurocognitive assessment, symptom scale, and Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire-Short Form (MSSQ-S).Participants were categorized into 3 groups based on a median split of the scores (eg, NONE, LOW, and HIGH). The LOW (n = 95) and HIGH (n = 92) groups (ie, MSSQ-S score > 0) were 2.64 times more likely (χ = 7.94, = .01, 95% confidence interval = 1.32, 5.26) to have baseline Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening scores larger than the clinical cutoffs than the NONE group (n = 70). No between-group main effects were present for the NONE (n = 52), LOW (n 89), and HIGH (n 90) MSSQ-S groups for verbal ( = .09, .91, η = .001) and visual ( = .15, .86, η = .001) memory, processing speed ( = .78, .46, η = .007), or reaction time ( = 2.21, .11, η = .002). The HIGH group exhibited higher total baseline symptom scores than the LOW ( 3325.50, = -1.99, .05, .15) and NONE ( 1647.50, = -2.83, .005, .24) groups.Motion sickness should be considered a preexisting risk factor that might influence specific domains of the baseline concussion assessment and postinjury management.
Reference Key
elbin2019motionjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Elbin, R J;Kontos, Anthony P;Sufrinko, Alicia;McElroy, Mallory;Stephenson-Brown, Katie;Mohler, Samantha;D'Amico, Nathan R;Collins, Michael W;
Journal journal of athletic training
Year 2019
DOI
10.4085/1062-6050-347-18
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.