comprehensive psychiatry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6038 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

comprehensive psychiatry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc
Short Name compr psychiatry
Abbreviated Name compr psychiatry
ISSN 1532-8384
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/comprehensive-psychiatry
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2020
The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) for DSM-5: A validation for neurodevelopmental disorders in Japanese outpatients
Nishiyama, Takeshi;Sumi, Satoshi;Watanabe, Hiroto;Suzuki, Futoshi;Kuru, Yukiko;Shiino, Tomoko;Kimura, Takuma;Wang, Chaochen;Lin, Yingsong;Ichiyanagi, Maya;Hirai, Kou;
Vol. 96 , pp. -
648 views Abstract
1970
Estimating the prevalence of borderline personality disorder in psychiatric outpatients using a two-phase procedure
Korzekwa MI;Dell PF;Links PS;Thabane L;Webb SP;;
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. -
445 views Abstract
2019
The mediating effect of motivations between psychiatric distress and gaming disorder among esport gamers and recreational gamers.
Bányai, Fanni;Griffiths, Mark D;Demetrovics, Zsolt;Király, Orsolya;
Vol. 94 , pp. 152117
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parenting styles, perceived social support and emotion regulation in adolescents with internet addiction.
Karaer, Yusuf;Akdemir, Devrim;
Vol. 92 , pp. 22-27
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender distribution in psychiatry journals' editorial boards worldwide.
Hafeez, Dawood M;Waqas, Ahmed;Majeed, Salman;Naveed, Sadiq;Afzal, Khalid I;Aftab, Zehra;Zeshan, Muhammad;Khosa, Faisal;
Vol. 94 , pp. 152119
371 views DOI Abstract
1996
Outpatients with DSM-III-R versus DSM-IV melancholic depression
Lafer, Beny;Nierenberg, Andrew A;Rosenbaum, Jerrold F;Fava, Maurizio;
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. 37-39
368 views Abstract
2007
The role of emotional intelligence and negative affect in bulimic symptomatology
Markey, Megan A.;Wal, Jillon S. Vander;
Vol. 48 , No. 5 , pp. 458-464
343 views Abstract
2019
Online shopping in treatment-seeking patients with buying-shopping disorder.
Müller, Astrid;Steins-Loeber, Sabine;Trotzke, Patrick;Vogel, Birte;Georgiadou, Ekaterini;de Zwaan, Martina;
Vol. 94 , pp. 152120
325 views DOI Abstract
1999
Panic disorder and cigarette smoking behavior
Amering, Michaela;Bankier, Bettina;Berger, Peter;Griengi, Hemma;Windhaber, Johann;Katschnig, Heinz;
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 35-38
320 views Abstract
2002
Measuring social anxiety and obsessive-compulsive spectra: Comparison of interviews and self-report instruments
Dell'Osso, Liliana;Rucci, Paola;Cassano, Giovanni B.;Maser, Jack D.;Endicott, Jean;Shear, M.Katherine;Sarno, Nannina;Saettoni, Marco;Grochocinski, Victoria J.;Frank, Ellen;
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 81-87
307 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.