dermatology online journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4167 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

dermatology online journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name dermatol online j
Abbreviated Name dermatol online j
ISSN 1087-2108
Aim and Scope
URL http://dermatology.cdlib.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2017
scleral buckling-induced ocular parameter changes in different age group patients of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
;Ashish Bedarkar;Ratnesh Ranjan;Perwez Khan;Ramesh Chandra Gupta;Rajnath Kushwaha;Shalini Mohan
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 94-99
720 views DOI Abstract
2017
surgical outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with air-assisted manual dissection for corneas with previous inflammation or fibrosis
;Yi-Ju Ho;Cheng-Hsiu Wu;Hung-Chi Chen;Chin-Shi Hsiao;Yi-Jen Hsueh;David Hui-Kang Ma
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 191-198
420 views DOI Abstract
2017
endoscope-assisted vitrectomy in the management of retinal detachment with corneal opacity
;Yu-Fang Huang;Chia-Jen Chang
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 164-167
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diet and psoriasis.
Pona, Adrian;Haidari, Wasim;Kolli, Sree S;Feldman, Steven R;
Vol. 25 , No. 2
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
A review of next generation sequencing technologies used in the evaluation of the skin microbiome: what a time to be alive.
Sandhu, Simran S;Pourang, Aunna;Sivamani, Raja K;
Vol. 25 , No. 7
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Elephantiasis nostras verrucosa: an atypical presentation following intrapelvic lymphoma.
Hadian, Yasmin;Link, Daniel;Dahle, Sara E;Isseroff, R Rivkah;
Vol. 25 , No. 12
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Twenty-year-old woman presenting with typical Kawasaki disease.
Vecerek, Natalia;Dupuy, Elizabeth O;Kang, Yuna;Sarantopoulos, G Peter;Worswick, Scott;Knowles, Byron C;
Vol. 25 , No. 7
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impacts of oral health symptoms, hygiene, and diet on the development and severity of psoriasis.
Macklis, Paul;Adams, Kevin M;Li, Daniel;Krispinsky, Andrew;Bechtel, Mark;Trinidad, John;Kaffenberger, Jessica;Kumar, Purnima;Kaffenberger, Benjamin H;
Vol. 25 , No. 7
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
Melanoma screening using patient self-assessed risk and total body photography.
Drugge, Elizabeth D;Okundaye, Osatohamwen I;Sarac, Rebecca M;Drugge, Rhett J;
Vol. 25 , No. 7
266 views DOI Abstract
2018
the relationship between optic atrophy 1 polymorphism and normal tension glaucoma in taiwan
;Yan-Ting Chen;San-Ni Chen;Chin-San Liu
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 82-86
246 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.