Indexed in Journament

stem cells international

ISSN 1687-966X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,239 of 29,297 scored journals (34,027 indexed)
70 Articles
Scores higher than 20.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name stem cells int
Abbreviated Name stem cells international
ISSN 1687-966X
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sci

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for stem cells international
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 24.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 6.0
Content Distribution 19.0 89.5
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (70)

2016
Isolation of an ES-Derived Cardiovascular Multipotent Cell Population Based on VE-Cadherin Promoter Activity
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
421 views Abstract
2018
bridging the gap: enriching youtube videos with jazz music annotations
Vol. 5 , pp. -
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Vernolactone Promotes Apoptosis and Autophagy in Human Teratocarcinomal (NTERA-2) Cancer Stem-Like Cells.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 6907893
414 views DOI Abstract
2016
Magnet-Bead Based MicroRNA Delivery System to Modify CD133+ Stem Cells
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
378 views Abstract
2016
Effects of Magnetically Guided, SPIO-Labeled, and Neurotrophin-3 Gene-Modified Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rat Model of Spinal Cord Injury
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
377 views Abstract
2018
the gutenberg english poetry corpus: exemplary quantitative narrative analyses
Vol. 5 , pp. -
300 views DOI Abstract
2026
Characterization of Carcinogenesis Resistance in Anatolian Blind Mole-rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Assessment of Transcriptomic Signatures
66 views DOI Abstract
2014
Concise Review: The Surface Markers and Identity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells
62 views DOI Abstract
2014
Intra‐Articular Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Proof‐of‐Concept Clinical Trial
61 views DOI Abstract
2026
Bridging the Translational Gap in Sex-Specific Alzheimer’s Disease Using Human iPSC-Based Neural Cell Models
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Paracrine Bone-Derived Senescent Secretome is Associated with Spatially Patterned ECM Remodeling and Altered Biomechanics in Human Brain Organoids
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Exploring Australian Public Attitudes Toward Organoid Research and Use: A Cross-Sectional Study
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
Msl3 -mediated H4K16ac suppresses 2C-like reprogramming by sustaining LINE1 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Characterization of Carcinogenesis Resistance in Anatolian Blind Mole-rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Assessment of Transcriptomic Signatures
66 views DOI Abstract
2026
Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Folliculogenesis and Fertility in Premature Ovarian Failure Mice via Regulating Steroid synthesis
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Immune cell development from human pluripotent stem cells
36 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,239 of 29,297 scored
(34,027 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

24.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

19.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.