Indexed in Journament

ans advances in nursing science

ISSN 1550-5014· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0/100
Journament Score
#8,293
Journament Rank
17
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ans adv nurs sci
Abbreviated Name ans adv nurs sci
ISSN 1550-5014
URL http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00012272-000000000-00000

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2010
a multi-party imaginary dialogue about power and cybernetics
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 197-207
382 views Abstract
Passionate scholarship 2001-2010: a vision for making academe safer for joyous risk-takers.
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. E50-64
303 views DOI Abstract
2005
good, clever and wise: a study of political meaning-making among integral change agents
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 98-117
295 views Abstract
2020
Vulnerability in Nurses: A Phenomenon That Cuts Across Professional and Private Spheres.
288 views DOI Abstract
2007
how i lost my mind and found the meaning of “life”
, No. 4 , pp. 59-72
269 views Abstract
2020
Vulnerability in Nurses: A Phenomenon That Cuts Across Professional and Private Spheres.
288 views DOI Abstract
2015
overview of rowson dissertation
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 75-78
130 views Abstract
2015
unfolding toward being: etty hillesum and the evolution of consciousness
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 80-122
192 views Abstract
2010
coaching ethics and immunity to change: a response to kjellström
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 4-18
149 views Abstract
2010
a multi-party imaginary dialogue about power and cybernetics
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 197-207
382 views Abstract
2009
transcript of developmentalists meeting
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 292-308
15 views Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.