aids care | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1956 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
31
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

aids care

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name aids care
Abbreviated Name aids care
ISSN 1360-0451
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/caic20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
"Not a walking piece of meat with disease": meanings of becoming undetectable among HIV-positive gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the U = U era.
Tan, Rayner Kay Jin;Lim, Jane Mingjie;Chan, Jeremiah Kah Wai;
, pp. 1-5
495 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Some of us, we don't know where we're going to be tomorrow." Contextual factors affecting PrEP use and adherence among a diverse sample of transgender women in San Francisco.
Cahill, Sean R;Keatley, JoAnne;Wade Taylor, S;Sevelius, Jae;Elsesser, Steven A;Geffen, Sophia R;Wang, Tim;Mayer, Kenneth H;
, pp. 1-9
393 views DOI Abstract
1998
Impact of diarrhoea and faecal incontinence on the daily life of HIV-infected patients
Snijders F;de Boer JB;Steenbergen B;Schouten M;Danner SA;van Dam FS;;
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. -
380 views Abstract
2009
Social protection to support vulnerable children and families: the potential of cash transfers to protect education, health and nutrition
Adato M;Bassett L;;
Vol. 21 Suppl 1 , No. S1 , pp. -
375 views Abstract
2015
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antiretroviral management, reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, and sexual risk behavior among perinatally HIV-infected youth in Thailand.
Lolekha, Rangsima;Boon-Yasidhi, Vitharon;Leowsrisook, Pimsiri;Naiwatanakul, Thananda;Durier, Yuitiang;Nuchanard, Wipada;Tarugsa, Jariya;Punpanich, Warunee;Pattanasin, Sarika;Chokephaibulkit, Kulkanya;
Vol. 27 , No. 5 , pp. 618-28
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Employers' views of the "Healthy Hub Roadshow": a workplace HIV testing intervention in England.
Blake, Holly;Hussain, Basharat;Hand, Jenny;Juma, Amdani;Evans, Catrin;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 181-185
349 views DOI Abstract
2020
"Support for the supporters": a qualitative study of the use of WhatsApp by and for mentor mothers with HIV in the UK.
Hay, Kiersten;Kwardem, L;Welbourn, A;Namiba, A;Tariq, S;Coventry, L;Dhairyawan, R;Durrant, A;
, pp. 1-9
348 views DOI Abstract
2013
"If I have nothing to eat, I get angry and push the pills bottle away from me": A qualitative study of patient determinants of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Musumari, Patou Masika;Feldman, Mitchell D;Techasrivichien, Teeranee;Wouters, Edwin;Ono-Kihara, Masako;Kihara, Masahiro;
Vol. 25 , No. 10 , pp. 1271-7
346 views DOI Abstract
2010
Factors influencing uptake of HIV care and treatment among children in South Africa - a qualitative study of caregivers and clinic staff.
Yeap, A D;Hamilton, R;Charalambous, S;Dwadwa, T;Churchyard, G J;Geissler, P W;Grant, A D;
Vol. 22 , No. 9 , pp. 1101-7
333 views DOI Abstract
2010
Persuading, protesting and exchanging favours: strategies used by Indian sex workers to win local support for their HIV prevention programmes.
Cornish, Flora;Shukla, Anuprita;Banerji, Riddhi;
Vol. 22 Suppl 2 , pp. 1670-8
332 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
31
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.