value in health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#774 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

value in health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci soc
Short Name value in health
Abbreviated Name value in health
ISSN 1098-3015
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/value-in-health
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2012
PIH20 Cost-Effectiveness of Supplemental N-3 in Total Parenteral Nutrition Therapy in the Italian, French, German and UK Context: A Discrete Event Simulation Model
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. A539-
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
t-cell responses in individuals infected with zika virus and in those vaccinated against dengue virus
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 274-292
301 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical usefulness of klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing k. pneumoniae genotyping: the experience of a single-center epidemic
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 352-370
296 views DOI Abstract
2014
Treatment Patterns And Quality Of Life Of Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: An Experience Of A Tertiary Health Care Centers (Treq-Af Study)
Vol. 17 , No. 7 , pp. A496-
295 views DOI
2017
circulating loxl2 levels reflect severity of intestinal fibrosis and galt cd4+ t lymphocyte depletion in treated hiv infection
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 239-252
266 views DOI Abstract
2017
diminished cd103 (aeb7) expression on resident t cells from the female genital tract of hiv-positive women
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 371-389
264 views DOI Abstract
2011
PND4 El Impacto Economico Del Tabaquismo En El Desarrollo De La Enfermedad Vascular Cerebral En Un Centro Neurologico De Tercer Nivel
Vol. 14 , No. 7 , pp. A564-
219 views DOI
2016
interferons and hiv infection: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 107-116
218 views DOI Abstract
2019
PND108 QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS AFTER ISCHAEMIC STROKE TREATED IN A PROVINCIAL HOSPITAL IN POLAND
Vol. 22 , pp. S757-S758
155 views DOI
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.