clinical usefulness of klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing k. pneumoniae genotyping: the experience of a single-center epidemic

Clicks: 362
ID: 157170
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 10 articles by views in value in health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: During the last decade, the spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae-carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) has increased dramatically worldwide. In this scenario, growing interest has been addressed to genotyping of KPC-Kp strains, which emerged as an important tool for a better understanding of the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the outbreaks. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients infected with KPC-Kp during a 28-month outbreak period (January 2010–April 2012) at San Gerardo Hospital (Monza, Italy), investigating KPC-Kp genotypes by means of repetitive element sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (Rep-PCR). Results: We enrolled 97 patients infected with KPC-Kp. Rep-PCR analysis identified 5 distinct clone types, with different distribution over time. During the first 12 months of the outbreak period, only 1 clone was detected (clone A, in 47 patients), while the 4 other clones were identified over the remaining 16 months (clones C, E, and F/L in 23, 24, and 3 patients respectively). Mechanical ventilation was less frequent in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L (OR=0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37) compared to clone A, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CI) was more likely to have a score >5 in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L (OR=7.21; 95% CI: 2.24-23.14) compared to clone A. Overall mortality was higher in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L (13/20 patients, 65%) compared to those infected with clone A (7/20, 35%). Mortality in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L remained significantly higher even after adjusting for the potential confounding effect of comorbidities (ie, CI), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 4.65 (95% CI: 1.83-11.89).
Reference Key
rossi2017pathogensclinical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Marianna Rossi;Liliane Chatenoud;Egidio Franco Viganò;Anna Maria Peri;Laura Alagna;Simone Bramati;Monica Manenti;Monica Raggi;Annalisa Cavallero;Luca Bisi;Sebastiano Leone;Guglielmo Marco Migliorino;Alessandra Bandera;Andrea Gori
Journal value in health
Year 2017
DOI
10.20411/pai.v1i2.109
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.