zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2519 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi
Abbreviated Name zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi
ISSN 1001-9391
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2018
[The application of ARIMA in forecasting the cases of rabies in China different human groups].
He, J;Luo, L;Jin, R G;Li, J M;
Vol. 36 , No. 7 , pp. 512-515
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Interference research of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on the pulmonary fibrosis in silicosis rats].
Sha, Y;Xie, Y;Chen, Z J;Yang, X Y;Luo, J;Zhang, B L;Zhang, X;Ji, X;Li, Z M;
Vol. 37 , No. 6 , pp. 401-407
387 views DOI Abstract
2018
[Applied study of Singapore occupational semi-quantitative risk assessment technique in occupational health risk assessment in a chair furniture manufacturing enterprise].
Liu, T;Zhang, P;Li, H;Zhang, C H;Ma, L;Zhang, M B;
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. 784-788
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Application of semi-quantitative risk assessment method in occupational health risk assessment of wooden furniture manufacturing enterprises].
Yang, Y;Xia, M;Chen, J;Tang, S H;Xu, S X;Zhao, Y;Liu, Y M;
Vol. 37 , No. 5 , pp. 369-373
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Occupational Health Risk Assessment of Low Concentrations Benzene Toluene and Xylenes].
Wang, A H;Leng, P B;Li, X H;Mao, G C;Xu, G Z;
Vol. 37 , No. 8 , pp. 627-632
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Characteristics of auditory brainstom response and auditory steady state evoked responses in noise-induced hearing loss population].
Zhang, J B;Liu, J;Ma, G F;Sun, D Y;
Vol. 37 , No. 12 , pp. 888-892
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
[A study of social assistance for patients with occupational diseases].
Lai, Y;Jing, J;Ai, L F;Tian, Y;Zhang, L B;Liu, Y Q;
Vol. 37 , No. 12 , pp. 957-960
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis on monitoring results of occupational hazards in Yangzhou city from 2014 to 2018].
Dou, J R;Zhao, Y;Cai, X;Mao, Y Y;Jin, W;Zhang, M R;Yao, H Q;Xu, P;
Vol. 37 , No. 12 , pp. 914-918
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Mediating effect of resilience on nursing occupational risk and job performance in nurses].
Liu, R H;Zou, Y;Wang, J;Lin, Q;Wang, F;
Vol. 37 , No. 8 , pp. 580-584
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of occupational stress and occupational exhaustion of primary caregivers].
Xu, S H;Tian, H E;Zhou, L P;Wang, Y;Zhang, L;Jia, S F;Liu, L;Li, X B;
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 197-201
319 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.