Indexed in Journament

current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental

ISSN 0011-393X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,838 of 29,312 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 18.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name curr ther res clin exp
Abbreviated Name curr ther res clin exp
ISSN 0011-393X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-therapeutic-research

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 55.6 25.9
Innovation 10.5 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 60.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2017
effects of autologous fat and ascs on swine hypertrophic burn scars: a multimodal quantitative analysis
Vol. 5 , No. 11 , pp. e1547-
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erythrocyte Partitioning Profile of Isosteviol in Human and Rat Blood.
Vol. 91 , pp. 1-4
362 views DOI Abstract
2013
objective integrated assessment of functional outcomes in reduction mammaplasty
Vol. 1 , No. 7 , pp. e61-
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Questionable Industry-Sponsored Postneonatal Pediatric Studies in Slovenia.
Vol. 90 , pp. 86-91
338 views DOI Abstract
2017
validation of a unilateral cleft lip surgical outcomes evaluation scale for surgeons and laypersons
Vol. 5 , No. 9 , pp. e1472-
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
2014
tissue expander capsule for abdominal wall in autologous breast reconstruction
Vol. 2 , No. 11 , pp. e247-
277 views DOI Abstract
2014
detergent-free decellularized nerve grafts for long-gap peripheral nerve reconstruction
Vol. 2 , No. 8 , pp. e201-
265 views DOI Abstract
2018
single lymphaticovenular anastomosis for early-stage lower extremity lymphedema treated by the superior-edge-of-the-knee incision method
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e1679-
258 views DOI Abstract
2017
hypercalcemia secondary to silicone breast implant rupture: a rare entity to keep in mind
Vol. 5 , No. 7 , pp. -
249 views DOI
2019
2019
Erythrocyte Partitioning Profile of Isosteviol in Human and Rat Blood.
Vol. 91 , pp. 1-4
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Questionable Industry-Sponsored Postneonatal Pediatric Studies in Slovenia.
Vol. 90 , pp. 86-91
338 views DOI Abstract
2018
free functional muscle transfer for thumb opposition
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. e1736-
32 views DOI Abstract
2018
management of severely atrophic maxilla in ectrodactyly ectodermal dysplasia-cleft syndrome
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e1678-
193 views DOI Abstract
2018
microsurgical engineering: bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap with flow-through intraflap anastomosis
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e1554-
105 views DOI Abstract
2018
tissue contraction—a new paradigm in breast reconstruction
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. e1865-
121 views DOI Abstract
2018
heparin-enhanced harvest and decanting for autologous fat transfer
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e1690-
182 views DOI
2018
quality improvement in facial transplantation: standard approach for novel procedures
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e1653-
31 views DOI
2018
single lymphaticovenular anastomosis for early-stage lower extremity lymphedema treated by the superior-edge-of-the-knee incision method
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e1679-
258 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,838 of 29,312 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.