validation of a unilateral cleft lip surgical outcomes evaluation scale for surgeons and laypersons

Клики: 374
ID: 130918
2017
Бесплатный PDF
Метрики качества и эффективности статьи
Общее качество
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Оценка качества ИИ
Не проанализировано
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 31 articles by views in current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Аннотация
Background:. A standardized evaluation tool is needed for the assessment of surgical outcomes in cleft lip surgery. Current scales for evaluating unilateral cleft lip/nose (UCL/N) aesthetic outcomes are limited in their reliability, ease of use, and application. The Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation (UCL SOE) scale measures symmetry of 4 components and sums these for a total score. The purpose of this study was to validate the SOE as a reliable tool for use by both surgeons and laypersons. Methods:. Twenty participants (9 surgeons and 12 laypeople) used the SOE to evaluate 25 sets of randomly selected presurgical and postsurgical standardized photographs of UCL/N patients. Interrater reliability for surgeon and laypeople was determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results:. Individual surgeons and laypeople both reached an ICC in the "fair to good" range (ICC = 0.42 and 0.59, respectively). Averaging 2 evaluators in the surgeon group improved the ICC to 0.58 and in the laypeople group to 0.74, respectively. Averaging 3 evaluators increased the ICC for surgeons to the "good" range (ICC = 0.71) and the ICC for laypeople to the "very good" range (ICC = 0.82). Conclusions:. Surgeon and layperson raters can reliably use the SOE to assess the aesthetics results after surgical repair of UCL/N, and improved reliability and reproducibility is achieved by averaging the scores of multiple reviewers.
Ссылочный ключ
md2017plasticvalidation Используйте этот ключ для автоцитирования в рукописи при использовании SciMatic Manuscript Manager или Thesis Manager
Авторы ;Alex Campbell, MD;Carolina Restrepo, MD;Gaurav Deshpande, MDS;Caroline Tredway, MD;Sarah M. Bernstein, MD, MHA;Rachel Patzer, PhD, MPH;Lisa Wendby;Bjorn Schonmeyr, MD, PhD
Журнал current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental
Год 2017
DOI
10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472
URL
http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472
Ключевые слова
surgery

Цитирования

Цитирования не найдены. Чтобы добавить цитирование, свяжитесь с администратором по адресу info@scimatic.org

Комментарии

Комментариев пока нет. Будьте первым, кто прокомментирует эту статью.