Indexed in Journament

Journal of applied clinical medical physics

ISSN 1526-9914· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,810 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 49.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Appl Clin Med Phys
Abbreviated Name j appl clin med phys
ISSN 1526-9914
URL https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15269914

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 15.7 5.8
Content Distribution 80.2 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2019
COMP Report: A survey of radiation safety regulations for medical imaging x-ray equipment in Canada.
Bjarnason, Thorarin A;Rees, Robert;Kainz, Judy;Le, Lawrence H;Stewart, Errol E;Preston, Brent;Elbakri, Idris;Fife, Ingvar A J;Lee, Ting-Yim;Gagnon, I Martin Benoît;Arsenault, Clément;Therrien, Pierre;Kendall, Edward;Tonkopi, Elena;Cottreau, Michelle;Aldrich, John E;
400 views DOI Abstract
2018
Regarding the parallel opposed editorial about: 3D printing technology will eventually eliminate the need of purchasing commercial phantoms for clinical medical physics QA procedures
Treutwein, M.
Vol. 19 , pp. 346
399 views DOI
2017
Measurement of skin surface dose distributions in radiation therapy using poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel dosimeters.
Eyadeh, Molham M;Wierzbicki, Marcin;Diamond, Kevin R;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 153-162
399 views DOI Abstract
2018
3D printing technology will eventually eliminate the need of purchasing commercial phantoms for clinical medical physics QA procedures
Ehler, E.
Vol. 19 , pp. 8-12
389 views DOI
2016
Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate.
Alrowaili, Ziyad A;Lerch, Michael L F;Petasecca, Marco;Carolan, Martin G;Metcalfe, Peter E;Rosenfeld, Anatoly B;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 85-98
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee, Boram;Jeong, Seonghoon;Chung, Kwangzoo;Yoon, Myonggeun;Park, Hee Chul;Han, Youngyih;Jung, Sang Hoon;
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy.
Chernavsky, Nicole E;Morcos, Marc;Wu, Pengwei;Viswanathan, Akila N;Siewerdsen, Jeffrey H;
360 views DOI Abstract
2018
Study of dosimetric properties of flattened and unflattened megavoltage x ray beam on high Z implant materials.
Rajamanickam, Tamilarasan;Muthu, Sivakumar;Murugan, Perumal;Pathokonda, Muddappa;Senthilnathan, Krishnamoorthy;Arunai Nambi Raj, Narayanasamy;Ramesh Babu, Padmanabhan;
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 265-273
350 views DOI Abstract
2017
Contrast enhancement for portal images by combination of subtraction and reprojection processes for Compton scattering.
Hariu, Masatsugu;Suda, Yuhi;Chang, Weishan;Myojoyama, Atsushi;Saitoh, Hidetoshi;
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 71-78
314 views DOI Abstract
2016
A novel phantom and procedure providing submillimeter accuracy in daily QA tests of accelerators used for stereotactic radiosurgery
Brezovich, I.
Vol. 17 , pp. 246-253
297 views DOI
2020
Performances of the beam monitoring system and quality assurance equipment for the HIMM of carbon-ion therapy.
Wei, Kun;Xu, Zhiguo;Mao, Ruishi;Zhao, Zulong;Zhao, Tiecheng;She, Qianshun;Kang, Xincai;Wang, Jianli;Li, Shengpeng;Li, Min;Song, Kai;Yang, Herun;Duan, Limin;
222 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT generated with GANs for MRI-only proton therapy treatment planning of brain tumors.
Kazemifar, Samaneh;Barragán Montero, Ana M;Souris, Kevin;Rivas, Sara T;Timmerman, Robert;Park, Yang K;Jiang, Steve;Geets, Xavier;Sterpin, Edmond;Owrangi, Amir;
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterization and longitudinal assessment of daily quality assurance for an MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) linac.
Mittauer, Kathryn E;Dunkerley, David A P;Yadav, Poonam;Bayouth, John E;
Vol. 20 , No. 11 , pp. 27-36
200 views DOI Abstract
2019
COMP Report: A survey of radiation safety regulations for medical imaging x-ray equipment in Canada.
Bjarnason, Thorarin A;Rees, Robert;Kainz, Judy;Le, Lawrence H;Stewart, Errol E;Preston, Brent;Elbakri, Idris;Fife, Ingvar A J;Lee, Ting-Yim;Gagnon, I Martin Benoît;Arsenault, Clément;Therrien, Pierre;Kendall, Edward;Tonkopi, Elena;Cottreau, Michelle;Aldrich, John E;
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy.
Chernavsky, Nicole E;Morcos, Marc;Wu, Pengwei;Viswanathan, Akila N;Siewerdsen, Jeffrey H;
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Feasibility of virtual starshot analysis providing submillimeter radiation isocenter accuracy: A long-term multi-institutional analysis.
Akino, Yuichi;Fujiwara, Masateru;Mizuno, Hirokazu;Shiomi, Hiroya;Kaneko, Akari;Isohashi, Fumiaki;Seo, Yuji;Suzuki, Osamu;Otani, Keisuke;Tamari, Keisuke;Ogawa, Kazuhiko;
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee, Boram;Jeong, Seonghoon;Chung, Kwangzoo;Yoon, Myonggeun;Park, Hee Chul;Han, Youngyih;Jung, Sang Hoon;
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of a simplified optimizer for MR-guided adaptive RT in case of pancreatic cancer.
Cusumano, Davide;Boldrini, Luca;Menna, Sebastiano;Teodoli, Stefania;Placidi, Elisa;Chiloiro, Giuditta;Placidi, Lorenzo;Greco, Francesca;Stimato, Gerardina;Cellini, Francesco;Valentini, Vincenzo;Azario, Luigi;De Spirito, Marco;
246 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of clinically relevant QA procedures for the BrainLab ExacTrac imaging system
Iftimia, I.
Vol. 19 , pp. 108-113
193 views DOI
2018
3D printing technology will eventually eliminate the need of purchasing commercial phantoms for clinical medical physics QA procedures
Ehler, E.
Vol. 19 , pp. 8-12
389 views DOI
Journament Score
32.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,810 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

80.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.