Indexed in Journament

Journal of medical Internet research

ISSN 1438-8871· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #241 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
296 Articles
Scores higher than 99.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Med Internet Res
Abbreviated Name j med internet res
ISSN 1438-8871
URL http://www.jmir.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 71.7 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.7 7.8
Content Distribution 60.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (296)

2020
Effects of COVID-19 on College Students’ Mental Health in the United States: Interview Survey Study
Changwon Son; Sudeep Hegde; Alec Smith; Xiaomei Wang; Farzan Sasangohar
2,835 views DOI
2005
The law of attrition
Eysenbach G;;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
1,155 views Abstract
2019
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review
Emily G. Lattie; Elizabeth C Adkins; Nathan Winquist; Colleen Stiles‐Shields; Q. Eileen Wafford; Andrea K. Graham
841 views DOI
2009
Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review
Fry JP;Neff RA;;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. -
841 views Abstract
2018
A Patient-Held Smartcard With a Unique Identifier and an mHealth Platform to Improve the Availability of Prenatal Test Results in Rural Nigeria: Demonstration Study
Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. e18-
761 views DOI Abstract
2012
Initial and Sustained Participation in an Internet-delivered Long-term Worksite Health Promotion Program on Physical Activity and Nutrition
Alex Burdorf;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. e43-
732 views DOI Abstract
2010
Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy
Susan Michie;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e4-
700 views DOI Abstract
2011
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
Nick Glozier;
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. e52-
678 views DOI Abstract
2018
Stigma and Its Association With Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study
Kaberi Dasgupta;
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. e151-
674 views DOI Abstract
2020
Technology Evaluation and Assessment Criteria for Health Apps (TEACH-Apps): Pilot Study
John Torous;
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. e18346-
658 views DOI Abstract
2025
Clinical Value of ChatGPT for Epilepsy Presurgical Decision-Making: Systematic Evaluation of Seizure Semiology Interpretation.
Luo, Yaxi; Jiao, Meng; Fotedar, Neel; Ding, Jun-En; Karakis, Ioannis; Rao, Vikram R; Asmar, Melissa; Xian, Xiaochen; Aboud, Orwa; Wen, Yuxin; Lin, Jack J; Hung, Fang-Ming; Sun, Hai; Rosenow, Felix; Liu, Feng
Vol. 27 , pp. e69173
91 views DOI Abstract
2025
Telehealth Interventions in Pharmacy Practice: Systematic Review of Reviews and Recommendations.
Chong, Rachel Lai Kay; Chan, Andrew Siang Ee; Chua, Crystal Min Siu; Lai, Yi Feng
Vol. 27 , pp. e57129
134 views DOI Abstract
2025
Effectiveness of Self-Training With a Web-Based Digital Health Application Versus Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Disorders of the Patella: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mayer, Tobias A; Koska, Daniel; Harsch, Ann-Kathrin; Maiwald, Christian
Vol. 27 , pp. e66463
123 views DOI Abstract
2025
Physical, Mental, and Health Empowerment Disparities Across Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, and Combined Groups and the Moderating Role of eHealth Literacy: Cross-Sectional Study.
Li, Jiaying; Wu, Xiaobing; Wu, Yibo; Fong, Daniel Yee Tak; Song, Yang; Xu, Siyi; Kim, Changhwan; Lin, Xiaohong; Pandian, Vinciya
Vol. 27 , pp. e70822
97 views DOI Abstract
2025
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale in China: Instrument Validation Study.
Guo, Rongrong; Zheng, Ziling; Yang, Fangyu; Wu, Ying
Vol. 27 , pp. e67948
139 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Longitudinal Effect of Psychological Distress on Internet Addiction Symptoms Among Chinese College Students: Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis.
Jiang, Yuxuan; Xiao, Chuman; Wang, Xiang; Yuan, Dongling; Liu, Qian; Han, Yan; Fan, Jie; Zhu, Xiongzhao
Vol. 27 , pp. e70680
91 views DOI Abstract
2024
Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review.
Zakiyah, Neily;Marulin, Dita;Alfaqeeh, Mohammed;Puspitasari, Irma Melyani;Lestari, Keri;Lim, Ka Keat;Fox-Rushby, Julia;
Vol. 26 , pp. e53500
139 views DOI Abstract
2023
Results and Methodological Implications of the Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References Among Twitter Users: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Analyses.
Parker, Maria A;Valdez, Danny;Rao, Varun K;Eddens, Katherine S;Agley, Jon;
Vol. 25 , pp. e48405
165 views DOI Abstract
2022
Improving Diagnosis Through Digital Pathology: Proof-of-Concept Implementation Using Smart Contracts and Decentralized File Storage.
Subramanian, Hemang;Subramanian, Susmitha;
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. e34207
287 views DOI Abstract
2021
Development of a COVID-19 Web Information Transmission Structure Based on a Quadruple Helix Model: Webometric Network Approach Using Bing.
Zhu, Yu Peng;Park, Han Woo;
Vol. 23 , No. 8 , pp. e27681
228 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
46.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #241 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

46.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

71.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.