Indexed in Journament

patient preference and adherence

ISSN 1177-889X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,928 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 11.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name patient prefer adherence
Abbreviated Name patient preference and adherence
ISSN 1177-889X
URL http://www.dovepress.com/patient-preference-and-adherence-journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for patient preference and adherence
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 42.0 25.7
Community Impact 14.3 5.8
Content Distribution 67.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
Interactive Network Platform Improves Compliance and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Patients with Allergic Rhinitis.
Vol. 13 , pp. 2101-2110
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of Estimated Community-Level Health Literacy on Treatment Initiation and Preventive Care Among Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed Diabetes.
Vol. 14 , pp. 1-11
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Treatment Adherence And Persistence Among HIV-1 Patients Newly Starting Treatment.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1927-1939
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1253-1268
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Every day I think about your messages": assessing text messaging engagement among Latino smokers in a mobile cessation program.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1213-1219
375 views DOI Abstract
2010
Gender differences in clinical, immunological, and virological outcomes in highly active antiretroviral-treated HIV–HCV coinfected patients
Vol. 2010 , No. default , pp. 97-103
363 views Abstract
2013
2008
Adherence in Internet-based interventions
Vol. 2 , pp. -
289 views Abstract
2008
Adherence in Internet-based interventions
Vol. 2 , pp. 57-65
255 views Abstract
2020
Effects of Estimated Community-Level Health Literacy on Treatment Initiation and Preventive Care Among Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed Diabetes.
Vol. 14 , pp. 1-11
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Interactive Network Platform Improves Compliance and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Patients with Allergic Rhinitis.
Vol. 13 , pp. 2101-2110
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Treatment Adherence And Persistence Among HIV-1 Patients Newly Starting Treatment.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1927-1939
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1253-1268
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Every day I think about your messages": assessing text messaging engagement among Latino smokers in a mobile cessation program.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1213-1219
375 views DOI Abstract
2015
the reconstruction of l’aquila, ancients and new devices
, No. 4 , pp. 118-151
101 views DOI Abstract
2014
a memory of shadows and of stone. traumatic ruins, conservation, social processes
, No. 2 , pp. 144-171
110 views DOI Abstract
2013
2010
Gender differences in clinical, immunological, and virological outcomes in highly active antiretroviral-treated HIV–HCV coinfected patients
Vol. 2010 , No. default , pp. 97-103
363 views Abstract
Journament Score
26.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,928 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

26.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.