Treatment Adherence And Persistence Among HIV-1 Patients Newly Starting Treatment.
Clicks: 400
ID: 69079
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
68.2
/100
400 views
256 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #3 of 13 articles by views in patient preference and adherence
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To assess adherence and persistence with first-line single-tablet regimen (STR) and multi-tablet regimen (MTR) antiretroviral therapy (ART) in newly treated HIV-1 patients.Retrospective analysis of longitudinal pharmacy claims among US patients initiating ART between 1/1/2016 and 5/31/2016 (index date was defined by first ART claim for STRs, and fill date for the last therapy in the regimen for MTRs). Adherence was assessed over a 12-month period and reported as the proportion of adherent or non-adherent (defined as ≤5-day and > a 5-day gap between successive fills, respectively) patients. Sensitivity analysis using ≤7-day and ≤14-day gap thresholds to define adherence was performed. Persistence was assessed as the number of days on therapy from index until treatment discontinuation (>90 day gap in therapy). Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox Proportional Hazard models were generated to evaluate discontinuation rates. Assessments were performed on STRs vs MTRs overall and by regimen.Patients initiating ART (STR: n=10,623; MTR: n=2504) had a mean age of 42.8 years; 76.0% were male. STR patients were >2 times more likely to be adherent over 12 months than MTR patients (24.9% vs 11.7%, respectively). Patients using EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF had greater adherence than those using other STRs. Among MTRs, patients were more adherent with FTC/TDF+DTG (15.1%) than other MTRs. Persistence was also greater with STRs, with MTR patients being 61% more likely to discontinue therapy. Persistence was best for FTC/TAF-based regimens. Predictors of treatment discontinuation included younger age, female gender, and Medicare or Medicaid insurance type.Patients receiving STRs were significantly less likely to discontinue therapy and were more adherent with their regimens, providing further evidence of greater adherence and persistence with STRs versus MTRs. However, there was a large proportion of patients who interrupted or discontinued treatment. Further research examining treatment patterns beyond first line is warranted.
| Reference Key |
hines2019treatmentpatient
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hines, Dionne M;Ding, Yao;Wade, Rolin L;Beaubrun, Anne;Cohen, Joshua P; |
| Journal | patient preference and adherence |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.2147/PPA.S207908
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.