European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging | Journament

Journal Ranking

#498 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 hours ago

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Abbreviated Name eur j nucl med mol imaging
ISSN 1619-7089
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (184 total)

2019
Application of an amyloid and tau classification system in subcortical vascular cognitive impairment patients.
Jang, Hyemin;Kim, Hee Jin;Park, Seongbeom;Park, Yu Hyun;Choe, Yeongsim;Cho, Hanna;Lyoo, Chul Hyoung;Yoon, Uicheul;Lee, Jin San;Kim, Yeshin;Kim, Seung Joo;Kim, Jun Pyo;Jung, Young Hee;Ryu, Young Hoon;Choi, Jae Yong;Moon, Seung Hwan;Seong, Joon-Kyung;DeCarli, Charles;Weiner, Michael W;Lockhart, Samuel N;Cho, Soo Hyun;Na, Duk L;Seo, Sang Won;
742 views DOI Abstract
2019
Automatic classification of dopamine transporter SPECT: deep convolutional neural networks can be trained to be robust with respect to variable image characteristics.
Wenzel, Markus;Milletari, Fausto;Krüger, Julia;Lange, Catharina;Schenk, Michael;Apostolova, Ivayla;Klutmann, Susanne;Ehrenburg, Marcus;Buchert, Ralph;
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial intelligence, machine (deep) learning and radio(geno)mics: definitions and nuclear medicine imaging applications.
Visvikis, Dimitris;Cheze Le Rest, Catherine;Jaouen, Vincent;Hatt, Mathieu;
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
AI-based applications in hybrid imaging: how to build smart and truly multi-parametric decision models for radiomics.
Castiglioni, Isabella;Gallivanone, Francesca;Soda, Paolo;Avanzo, Michele;Stancanello, Joseph;Aiello, Marco;Interlenghi, Matteo;Salvatore, Marco;
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Advances in CNS PET: the state-of-the-art for new imaging targets for pathophysiology and drug development.
McCluskey, Stuart P;Plisson, Christophe;Rabiner, Eugenii A;Howes, Oliver;
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
Brain PET amyloid and neurodegeneration biomarkers in the context of the 2018 NIA-AA research framework: an individual approach exploring clinical-biomarker mismatches and sociodemographic parameters.
Coutinho, Artur Martins;Busatto, Geraldo F;de Gobbi Porto, Fábio Henrique;de Paula Faria, Daniele;Ono, Carla Rachel;Garcez, Alexandre Teles;Squarzoni, Paula;de Souza Duran, Fábio Luiz;de Oliveira, Maira Okada;Tres, Eduardo Sturzeneker;Brucki, Sonia Maria Dozzi;Forlenza, Orestes Vicente;Nitrini, Ricardo;Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto;
311 views DOI Abstract
2011
Luxembourg Report : Report on the French-Belgian-Luxembourgish Joint Congress of Nuclear Medicine, Luxembourg, 7-9 May 2011: "a new era of networking and communication in nuclear medicine: Non-angry lobbying in favour of a new nuclear reactor for medical use coinciding with angry antinuclear power plant demonstrations in Luxembourg"
Als, C.
Vol. 38 , pp. 2107-2109
309 views DOI
2016
(11)C-Choline PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer. Results from 4,426 scans in a single-centre patient series.
Graziani, Tiziano;Ceci, Francesco;Castellucci, Paolo;Polverari, Giulia;Lima, Giacomo Maria;Lodi, Filippo;Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe;Ardizzoni, Andrea;Schiavina, Riccardo;Fanti, Stefano;
Vol. 43 , No. 11 , pp. 1971-9
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improved quantification of amyloid burden and associated biomarker cut-off points: results from the first amyloid Singaporean cohort with overlapping cerebrovascular disease.
Tanaka, Tomotaka;Stephenson, Mary C;Nai, Ying-Hwey;Khor, Damian;Saridin, Francis N;Hilal, Saima;Villaraza, Steven;Gyanwali, Bibek;Ihara, Masafumi;Vrooman, Henri;Weekes, Ashley A;Totman, John J;Robins, Edward G;Chen, Christopher P;Reilhac, Anthonin;
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID19 impact on nuclear medicine: an Australian perspective
Currie, G.
Vol. 47 , pp. 0-0
207 views DOI
View All 184 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.