Brain PET amyloid and neurodegeneration biomarkers in the context of the 2018 NIA-AA research framework: an individual approach exploring clinical-biomarker mismatches and sociodemographic parameters.

Clicks: 315
ID: 97522
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
[F]FDG-PET and [C]PIB-PET are validated as neurodegeneration and amyloid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We used a PET staging system based on the 2018 NIA-AA research framework to compare the proportion of amyloid positivity (A+) and hypometabolism ((N)+) in cases of mild probable AD, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and healthy controls, incorporating an additional classification of abnormal [F]FDG-PET patterns and investigating the co-occurrence of such with A+, exploring [F]FDG-PET to generate hypotheses in cases presenting with clinical-biomarker "mismatches."Elderly individuals (N = 108) clinically classified as controls (N = 27), aMCI (N = 43) or mild probable AD (N = 38) were included. Authors assessed their A(N) profiles and classified [F]FDG-PET neurodegenerative patterns as typical or non-typical of AD, performing re-assessments of images whenever clinical classification was in disagreement with the PET staging (clinical-biomarker "mismatches"). We also investigated associations between "mismatches" and sociodemographic and educational characteristics.AD presented with higher rates of A+ and (N)+. There was also a higher proportion of A+ and (N)+ individuals in the aMCI group in comparison to controls, however without statistical significance regarding the A staging. There was a significant association between amyloid positivity and AD (N)+ hypometabolic patterns typical of AD. Non-AD (N)+ hypometabolism was seen in all A- (N)+ cases in the mild probable AD and control groups and [F]FDG-PET patterns classified such individuals as "SNAP" and one as probable frontotemporal lobar degeneration. All A- (N)- cases in the probable AD group had less than 4 years of formal education and lower socioeconomic status (SES).The PET-based staging system unveiled significant A(N) differences between AD and the other groups, whereas aMCI and controls had different (N) staging, explaining the cognitive impairment in aMCI. [F]FDG-PET could be used beyond simple (N) staging, since it provided alternative hypotheses to cases with clinical-biomarker "mismatches." An AD hypometabolic pattern correlated with amyloid positivity. Low education and SES were related to dementia in the absence of biomarker changes.
Reference Key
coutinho2020braineuropean Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Coutinho, Artur Martins;Busatto, Geraldo F;de Gobbi Porto, Fábio Henrique;de Paula Faria, Daniele;Ono, Carla Rachel;Garcez, Alexandre Teles;Squarzoni, Paula;de Souza Duran, Fábio Luiz;de Oliveira, Maira Okada;Tres, Eduardo Sturzeneker;Brucki, Sonia Maria Dozzi;Forlenza, Orestes Vicente;Nitrini, Ricardo;Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto;
Journal European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
Year 2020
DOI
10.1007/s00259-020-04714-0
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.