Indexed in Journament

Minerva anestesiologica

ISSN 1827-1596· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.4/100
Journament Score
#8,463
Journament Rank
17
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Minerva Anestesiol
Abbreviated Name minerva anestesiol
ISSN 1827-1596
URL http://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/minerva-anestesiologica/index.php

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2017
evaluation of the effect of transdermal nitroglycerine patch on intrathecal dexmedetomidine as additive, on postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 51-55
465 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill patients: can we re-program the immune system? A primer for intensivists
, pp. -
453 views Abstract
2019
Effects of the anesthesia technique used during cesarean section on maternal-neonatal thiol disulfide homeostasis.
397 views DOI Abstract
2016
Prognostic value of the reactive oxygen species in severe sepsis and septic shock patients: a pilot study.
Vol. 82 , No. 12 , pp. 1306-1313
349 views Abstract
2019
Tracheal amylase: a cheap way to predict ventilator associated pneumonia in patients with traumatic brain injury.
339 views DOI
2001
[The mandrake root and the Viennese Dioscorides].
Vol. 67 , No. 10 , pp. 751-66
320 views Abstract
2012
Aiming is not enough: you must hit
Vol. 78 , No. 12 , pp. -
276 views Abstract
2015
Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin to hepcidin ratio as a biomarker of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients
Vol. 81 , No. 11 , pp. -
275 views Abstract
2014
Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin to hepcidin ratio as a biomarker of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients.
Vol. 81 , No. 11 , pp. 1-
244 views
2024
Factors to consider for fascial plane blocks' success in acute and chronic pain management.
100 views DOI Abstract
2024
Telephone informed consent hurdles in pandemic surgery research.
98 views DOI
2020
pericapsular nerve group block: innovation or just a fad?
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
104 views DOI
2020
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill patients: can we re-program the immune system? A primer for intensivists
, pp. -
453 views Abstract
2019
Tracheal amylase: a cheap way to predict ventilator associated pneumonia in patients with traumatic brain injury.
339 views DOI
2019
Effects of the anesthesia technique used during cesarean section on maternal-neonatal thiol disulfide homeostasis.
397 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of the effect of transdermal nitroglycerine patch on intrathecal dexmedetomidine as additive, on postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 51-55
465 views DOI Abstract
2017
volume capnography: a narrative review
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 33-38
126 views DOI Abstract
2016
Prognostic value of the reactive oxygen species in severe sepsis and septic shock patients: a pilot study.
Vol. 82 , No. 12 , pp. 1306-1313
349 views Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.