maturitas | Journament

Journal Ranking

#310 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 7 hours ago

maturitas

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name maturitas
Abbreviated Name maturitas
ISSN 1873-4111
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2016
parent-reported mental health problems and mental health services use in south australian school-aged children
;Jing Wu;Eleonora Dal Grande;Helen Winefield;Danny Broderick;Rhiannon Pilkington;Tiffany K Gill;Anne W Taylor
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 750-768
447 views DOI Abstract
2017
use of safety pin on garments in pregnancy: a belief and cultural practice with potential harmful effect
;Kola M Owonikoko;Aramide M Tijani;Olarewaju G Bajowa;Oluseyi O Atanda
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 19-32
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reducing inappropriate prescribing for older adults with advanced frailty: A review based on a survey of practice in four countries.
O'Caoimh, Rónán;Cornally, Nicola;McGlade, Ciara;Gao, Yang;O'Herlihy, Eileen;Svendrovski, Anton;Clarnette, Roger;Lavan, Amanda Hanora;Gallagher, Paul;William Molloy, D;
Vol. 126 , pp. 1-10
394 views DOI Abstract
2018
the application of implementation science theories for population health: a critical interpretive synthesis
;Jessie-Lee McIsaac;Grace Warner;Logan Lawrence;Robin Urquhart;Sheri Price;Jacqueline Gahagan;Mary McNally;Lois A Jackson
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 13-30
334 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effect of exercise on sleep quality and insomnia in middle-aged women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Rubio-Arias JÁ;Marín-Cascales E;Ramos-Campo DJ;Hernandez AV;Pérez-López FR;;
Vol. 100 , pp. -
312 views Abstract
2019
Management of bone health in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: Systematic appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and algorithm development.
Kiriakova, Velislava;Cooray, Shamil D;Yeganeh, Ladan;Somarajah, Gowri;Milat, Frances;Vincent, Amanda J;
Vol. 128 , pp. 70-80
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel approach to integrated care using mobile technology within home services. The ADMR pilot study.
Bousquet, Jean;Meissonnier, Marc;Michalet, Véronique;Toupnot, Anne;Paccard, Delphine;Noguès, Michel;Anto, Josep M;Riso, Jean Pierre;Collomb, Maud;d'Abboville, Thierry;Duranton, Laurent;
Vol. 129 , pp. 1-5
289 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of red clover (Trifolium pratense) isoflavones on the lipid profile of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kanadys, Wieslaw;Baranska, Agnieszka;Jedrych, Marian;Religioni, Urszula;Janiszewska, Mariola;
Vol. 132 , pp. 7-16
279 views DOI Abstract
2017
A cross-sectional cluster analysis of the combined association of physical activity and sleep with sociodemographic and health characteristics in mid-aged and older adults
Rayward AT;Duncan MJ;Brown WJ;Plotnikoff RC;Burton NW;;
Vol. 102 , pp. -
279 views Abstract
2020
The Mediterranean diet: A historical perspective on food for health.
Hidalgo-Mora, Juan José;García-Vigara, Alicia;Sánchez-Sánchez, María Luz;García-Pérez, Miguel-Ángel;Tarín, Juan;Cano, Antonio;
Vol. 132 , pp. 65-69
241 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.