Indexed in Journament

applied computational intelligence and soft computing

ISSN 1687-9724· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,005 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
88 Articles
Scores higher than 42% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nombre Corto applied computational intelligence and soft computing
Nombre Abreviado applied computational intelligence and soft computing
ISSN 1687-9724
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/acisc

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for applied computational intelligence and soft computing
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 27.8 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 9.3 9.7
Content Distribution 62.3 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (88)

2017
an investigation into self-translation
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 1260-1267
587 views DOI Abstract
2017
the role of photography in conceptual art in iranian artists
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 831-847
543 views DOI Abstract
2018
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin bilgi kaynakları / knowledge sources of university students
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 595-608
480 views DOI Abstract
2018
Concepts, Methods, and Performances of Particle Swarm Optimization, Backpropagation, and Neural Networks
Vol. 2018
466 views DOI Abstract
2012
2018
Performance Assessment of Multiple Classifiers Based on Ensemble Feature Selection Scheme for Sentiment Analysis
Vol. 2018
405 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of Decision Support Model for Selecting a Maintenance Plan Using a Fuzzy MCDM Approach: A Theoretical Framework
Vol. 2018
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Application of Bat Algorithm for Transport Network Design Problem
Vol. 2019
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning Based Genetic Algorithm for Task Graph Scheduling
Vol. 2019
262 views DOI Abstract
2018
technology transfer in digital era: legal environment
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 354-363
243 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
status and role transformations of the elderly in modern russia
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 132-141
200 views DOI Abstract
2018
shortcomings of evaluation worksheets for scientific art articles in iran based on merton's science norms
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 166-178
170 views DOI Abstract
2018
peyzaj mimarlığında heykel kullanımı: trabzon kenti Örneği / monument usage in landscape architecture: example of trabzon city
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 553-564
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin bilgi kaynakları / knowledge sources of university students
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 595-608
480 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of Decision Support Model for Selecting a Maintenance Plan Using a Fuzzy MCDM Approach: A Theoretical Framework
Vol. 2018
381 views DOI Abstract
2018
Concepts, Methods, and Performances of Particle Swarm Optimization, Backpropagation, and Neural Networks
Vol. 2018
466 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,005 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

27.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.