foot & ankle orthopaedics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#10086 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 месяц назад

foot & ankle orthopaedics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Индексации
doaj
Краткое название foot & ankle orthopaedics
Сокращённое название foot & ankle orthopaedics
ISSN
Цели и охват
URL
Инструкции для авторов

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
Case Series: Allograft Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Utilizing Fresh Talus
MD, Joshua Vaughn;MD, Kenneth W. DeFontes;BA, Cornelia Keyser;PhD, Eric M. Bluman MD,;MD, Jeremy T. Smith;
Vol. 4 , pp. -
609 views Abstract
2017
The Peroneus Brevis and Plantar Fascia Insertions Are Related to Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures
PhD, Ali Hosseini;BSc(Med), Pim Van Dijk;MSc, Sofie Breuking;MD, Bryan Vopat;MBA, Daniel Guss MD,;MD, A. Holly Johnson;MD, Christopher DiGiovanni;
Vol. 2 , pp. -
337 views Abstract
2016
Tissue Biopsy in Infected Foot and Ankle Surgery
Abdalla, Samir;FRCS(Tr&Orth), Daoud Makki MD,;Elgamal, tarel;ChB, David Harvey MB;FRCS(Tr&Orth), Gillian Jackson MBChB, MRCS,;FRCS, Simon R. Platt MB ChB,;
Vol. 1 , pp. -
321 views Abstract
2016
3-D CT Analysis of Screw and Suture-Button Fixation for Syndesmosis Repair
BS, Jason M. Schon;BS, Brady T. Williams;Venderley, Melanie B.;MD, Jonathon D. Backus;Dornan, Grant J.;PhD, Travis L. Turnbull;PhD, Robert Laprade MD,;MD, Thomas O. Clanton;
Vol. 1 , pp. -
312 views Abstract
2017
Patient-Specific Finite-Element Analysis of Three Intramedullary Nails for Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion
PhD, Christopher Yakacki;BS, Patrick Terrill;PhD, Robert Carpenter;DPM, Douglas Pacaccio;
Vol. 2 , pp. -
301 views Abstract
2018
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using a Straight Intramedullary Nail
FRCS(Tr&Orth), Lucky Jeyaseelan;FRCS(Orth), Nicholas Cullen;FRCS(Tr&Orth), Andrew Goldberg MD, MBBS,;FRCS(Orth), Matthew Welck MD,;
Vol. 3 , pp. -
300 views Abstract
2018
One-step Management of Severely Deformed, Long-Neglected Club Feet
MD, Michael Strauss;PhD, Isabella van Dalen MD,;
Vol. 3 , pp. -
293 views Abstract
2017
latar belakang kecemasan anak pra sekolah kasus a (im) siswa taman kanak-kanak ar-rahmah palembang
;Aslam Tamisa
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
276 views Abstract
2017
peran orang tua dalam penanggulangan penyalahgunaan narkoba pada generasi muda
;Iredho Fani Reza
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
256 views Abstract
2017
hubungan antara penataan ruangan kerja terhadap stres kerja karyawan di instalasi gizi rumah sakit islam siti khodiijah palembang
;Sy Muznah;Rosyidah Umpu Malwa
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
180 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.