journal of ict research and applications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#476 / 33,900
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 41 minutes ago

journal of ict research and applications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name journal of ict research and applications
Abbreviated Name journal of ict research and applications
ISSN 2337-5787
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (52 total)

2014
A Proposed Arabic Handwritten Text Normalization Method
Abu-Ain, Tarik;Abdullah, Siti Norul Huda Sheikh;Omar, Khairuddin;Abu-Ein, Ashraf;Bataineh, Bilal;Abu-Ain, Waleed;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 164-175
331 views Abstract
2010
micronutrient modeling for mimosa scabrella bentham in the curitiba metropolitan region, parana state, brazil modelagem de micronutrientes para mimosa scabrella na região metropolitana de curitiba, estado do paraná
;Saulo Jorge Téo;Sebastião do Amaral Machado;Afonso Figueiredo Filho;Carlos Bruno Reissmann
, No. 59 , pp. -
292 views DOI Abstract
2017
nutrient solutions for rubber-tree rootstocks production
;Fabio Olivieri de Nobile;Gabriel Fernando Paro;Rogério Farinelli
Vol. 37 , No. 89 , pp. 73-80
276 views DOI Abstract
2011
efeitos da correção de dados na redução da heterogeneidade das variâncias genética, ambiental e fenotípica em testes de progênies de eucalyptus grandis w. hill ex maiden effects of different data transformation methods on the reduction of the genetic, environmental and phenotypic variance in the progeny trial of eucalyptus grandis w. hill ex maiden
;José Elidney Pinto Júnior;José Alfredo Sturion;Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende;Pedro Ronzelli Júnior
, No. 51 , pp. -
270 views DOI Abstract
2015
Strengthening Crypto-1 Cipher Against Algebraic Attacks
Afianti, Farah;Barmawi, Ari M.;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 88-110
269 views Abstract
2017
conteúdo de nutrientes na serapilheira em três fisionomias do cerrado do distrito federal
;Fabiana Piontekowski Ribeiro;Angela Pereira Bussinguer;Barbara Elias Reis Hodecker;Alcides Gatto
Vol. 37 , No. 92 , pp. 465-473
260 views DOI Abstract
2015
erva-mate production and conservation of araucaria forest
;Pablo Signor;Gabriela Schmitz Gomes;Luciano Farinha Watzlawick
Vol. 35 , No. 83 , pp. 199-208
257 views DOI Abstract
2014
growth and biomass partitioning of mulungu seedlings in response to phosphorus fertilization and mycorrhizal inoculation
;Tiago de Sousa Leite;Rômulo Magno Oliveira de Freitas;Jeferson Luiz Dallabona Dombroski;Moadir de Sousa Leite;Mara Raquel de Oliveira Rodrigues
Vol. 34 , No. 80 , pp. 407-415
250 views DOI Abstract
2011
effect of liming, gafsa rock phosphate and triple superphosphate in early growth and phosphorus uptake in eucalyptus dunnii efeito da calagem, do fosfato natural de gafsa e superfosfato triplo no crescimento inicial e absorção de p em eucalyptus dunnii
;Shizuo Maeda;Itamar Antonio Bognola
Vol. 31 , No. 68 , pp. -
243 views DOI Abstract
2013
dendroecologia de cedrela fissilis na floresta ombrófila mista
;Andrea Chizzotti Cusatis;Paulo André Trazzi;Mário Dobner Júnior;Antonio Rioyei Higa
Vol. 33 , No. 75 , pp. 287-297
226 views DOI Abstract
View All 52 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.