oncology reports | Journament

Journal Ranking

#151 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

oncology reports

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name oncol rep
Abbreviated Name oncol rep
ISSN 1021-335X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2019
Identification of TPD52 and DNAJB1 as two novel bile biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma by iTRAQ‑based quantitative proteomics analysis.
Ren, Hongyue;Luo, Mingxu;Chen, Jinzhong;Zhou, Yanming;Li, Xiumei;Zhan, Yanyan;Shen, Dongyan;Chen, Bo;
Vol. 42 , No. 6 , pp. 2622-2634
312 views DOI Abstract
2009
In vitro anti-neoplastic activity of the ethno-pharmaceutical plant Hypericum adenotrichum Spach endemic to Western Turkey.
Ozmen, Ali;Bauer, Sabine;Gridling, Manuela;Singhuber, Judith;Krasteva, Stanimira;Madlener, Sibylle;Vo, Than Phuong Nha;Stark, Nicole;Saiko, Philipp;Fritzer-Szekeres, Monika;Szekeres, Thomas;Askin-Celik, Tülay;Krenn, Liselotte;Krupitza, Georg;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 845-52
275 views Abstract
2015
metodologia de pesquisas na internet: breves considerações sobre uma pesquisa qualitativa em turismo nas redes sociais
;Fernanda Meneses de Miranda Castro;Carolina de Andrade Spinola
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 170-188
272 views Abstract
2015
Clinical implication of the preoperative GSA index in ⁹⁹mTc-GSA scintigraphy in hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.
Nishikawa, Hiroki;Osaki, Yukio;Komekado, Hideyuki;Sakamoto, Azusa;Saito, Sumio;Nishijima, Norihiro;Nasu, Akihiro;Arimoto, Akira;Kita, Ryuichi;Kimura, Toru;
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 1071-8
252 views DOI Abstract
2020
Downregulation of GPSM2 is associated with primary resistance to paclitaxel in breast cancer.
Zhang, Zhe;Li, Zhi;Deng, Mingming;Liu, Bofang;Xin, Xing;Zhao, Zhenkun;Zhang, Ye;Lv, Qingjie;
233 views DOI Abstract
2019
Οlive tree blossom polyphenolic extracts exert antioxidant and antimutagenic activities in vitro and in various cell lines.
Kouka, Paraskevi;Tekos, Fotios;Valta, Kalliopi;Mavros, Panagiotis;Veskoukis, Aristidis S;Angelis, Apostolis;Skaltsounis, Alexios-Leandros;Kouretas, Demetrios;
227 views DOI Abstract
2020
A signature of tumor immune microenvironment genes associated with the prognosis of non‑small cell lung cancer.
Li, Jia;Li, Xin;Zhang, Chenyue;Zhang, Chenxing;Wang, Haiyong;
223 views DOI Abstract
2016
nueva ruralidad y sustentabilidad social en el pueblo mÁgico de calvillo, aguascalientes
;Alejandro Palafox-Muñoz;María Guadalupe Martínez-Perezchica;Julia Sderis Anaya-Ortiz
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 64-81
211 views Abstract
2016
restaurantes con servicio completo en el distrito federal entre la productividad y competitividad
;Ricardo Varela-Juárez;Eduardo Alfonso Mercado-Peña
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 130-143
209 views Abstract
1997
Endometrial carcinoma in a breast cancer patient treated with tamoxifen: Activation of K-ras proto-oncogene
Varras, M.
Vol. 4 , pp. 1045-1046
179 views
View All 29 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.